| |
|
|
- Page 1 - |
|
GDL | Hello ,
i want some Proceduren of my Modellbahnsteuerung gladly in a dll transfiguring, if so this Programmteil faster runs.
have but none blassen Schimmer How one this angeht.has this someone already once made? selected Support.
Hello Georg |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
- Page 3 - |
|
|
GDL | OK, now Better get going To high for me.then runs with XProfan hold NEN bisschen slower.
was but to that Reinschnüffeln right interestingly.
Hello Georg |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing | [quote:25c1edbc3a]can I a ASM .dell or dll at all another Procedure in the Hauptprogramm Call and The dll return or must everything in same dll stand. Can at all in a dll several procs and have between rumspringen?[/quote:25c1edbc3a] i think, I know, on what You out want. You can of Profan from Variables and Texts on The Dll transfer, and just as can also The Dll Variables and Texts back give. The Dll can several functions own and You can also a function in a others function Call. You can even from the Dll a Profan-Prozedure Call.
Perhaps get You Yes once more pleasure, moreover To sniff |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GDL | I can with the concept function in this Context nothing begin. can there a function too one Proc his.means not one einzelner commands, separate one ganzes Unterprogramm what in the Hauptprogramm in a Proc runs. I do me usually always right heavy, what your with of/ one function means.
Hello Georg |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Michael Dell | The functions of/ one Dll are in the principle the same as an Proc in Profan and exists from discretionary many command!
Nachtrag: The Difference lying therein the with Dll- Funtionen only values & String- Adressen transfer and zurückgegeben go! therefore are Strukturierte reaches so important! |
|
|
| Salu Michael...
Hab zwar krumme Fieß awer dofir e' ecklich Gsicht! | 10/10/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
GDL | @Frank,
if I it momentarily neither on The row get must I but nevertheless go on.with ours Vereinsgrossanlage lasting The Datensammlung,Auswertung and Übertragung with 100 Loks, 50 Weichen and 80 signals apiece Kommponente ca. 15 sec.these for Viewer of/ one equipment too slow.
God Thanks haven't any such facilities.
Hello Georg |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GDL | the whole do I me desswegen on :
Softlok z.B. is a reines DOS Program.
duration of/ one typischen Softlokkette on the equal PC
DOS Ver. 6.1 0,01 To 0,04 sec WinME 0,08 To 0,6 sec on my computer with 5 facher Taktfrequenz under WinXP satte 1,3 To 1,5 sec.
these but one Schrittkettenprogramm without grosser Anlagenauswertung. If each windows still NEN switch to that turn off the 20 ms request had.
Hello Georg |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing | this is exactly the reason, Why me Profan as Programmsprache on my own not reicht. my programs consist therefore in the rule from over 95 percent Profancode, but whom remainder (everything zeitintensive) make I with Assembler. this simple XPIA-Democode demonstrating beautiful The Zeitersparniss in only of/ one only Loop: CompileMarkSeparation Nachtrag: The Assemblerschleife could one too so solve: CompileMarkSeparation here again The same Loop in Profan: CompileMarkSeparation |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GDL | have XPSE and XPIA updated come but only To hierhin. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| what other Georg - I see You kombinierst The switch so the kompilier and gelinkt becomes, launch then but whom Interpreter, thereby could You still rather one E instead of one I take what The EXE executing instead of whom limp Interpreter. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Frank Abbing | so ought to The first Line in your code looks: {$iq} to that testing reicht Yes the Interpreter. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GDL | Hi,
alike I eingebe and alike which Beispielprog I take, It's all right only so far How on the screenshoot visible.
Hello Georg |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GDL | If I fehlersuche.bat ausführe comes |
|
|
| |
|
|