| |
| |
|
Sebastian
König | Hello together,
here time a Kleinigkeit To christmas  there me someone therefore gebeten having, have I a code, the one with DLLs directly and without detour over a temporary File a Speicherbereich (the to that Example of Frank Abbings Datengenerator prepares becomes) into Program loading can, of C to XProfan Translated and a Include prepares. there it Perhaps yet others interested, poste I it time here. 
The Benutzung is really very simply and ought to on hand the beigelegten Testcodes slight nachzuvollziehen his - otherwise simply ask! unfortunately functions it first ex XProfan 9.0, I Version 8.0 some verschachtelten long()-Aufrufe somehow not very good likes... 
plenty Fun so and naturally glad christmas!
Sebastian |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]  Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 12/24/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | Hello Sebastian,
could it not yet correctly. testing. XPSE likes your two Long one after another somehow (yet) not. i think, iF creates there soon remedy.
so a engineering would too take off The with XPIA begot Codes, i'll to whom holidays time so experiment.
Happy solid! |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Oh, this is beautiful 
now can I MemoryModule directly in XProfan benefit. are Yes again ungeahnte Opportunities.
beautiful Weihnachtsgeschenk
Greeting
Thomas |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | [quote:ba811f0967]could it not yet correctly. testing. XPSE likes your two Long one after another somehow (yet) not. i think, iF creates there soon remedy.[/quote:ba811f0967] for the time being can You it indeed simply with XProfan directly testing...  |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 12/25/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | functions correct, if I these engineering with XPIA use would. where therefore for XPIA two valuable Features come into being:
- The Dll is now permanent in memory and need not any more explizit loaded To go. about, if a function on The variables of/ one others function grab would like
- The Dll need not any more temporär written To go
Grosser disadvantage But the release through FreeLibraryM(hModule&). here can XPIA not always The suitable place discern, when the Module again released go must. End is sure not each Program present. though think I, that the Module with neueren Windowsversionen automatically released becomes, once itself the Hauptprogramm exits.
Dürfte I The Inc really in XPIA use? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | Hello Frank,
[quote:6a4bc8234d=Frank Abbing]Dürfte I The Inc really in XPIA use?[/quote:6a4bc8234d]
How I straight check had, is the question relatively tricky...
because How the ursprüngliche C-code standing The Inc under the LGPL. for the usage in XPIA self see I therefore no Problems - the would Yes in the Grunde only one zusätzliches $I MemoryModule.inc into begot Codes integrate.
The crucial question is, what the whole well for programs, The then The Inc using, bedeuted. For this, first one Wikipedia-statement:
[quote:6a4bc8234d=Wikipedia]in the Contrast to GPL can any programs, The LGPL-licensed software only extern using, to that example LookupAccountName Files, your Own license keep. so eignet the LGPL particularly as license for Bibliotheken, its Benutzung one too Programmierern proprietärer programs permit wants. should The under the LGPL licensed software against it solid into other Program eingebunden go, must too the others Program under the LGPL or. of/ one kompatiblen license stand.[/quote:6a4bc8234d]
sound first not so cool. the Einbinden the Inc is well quite clear as statisches left To interpret. and too one Compile the Inc as Unit would on the situation nothing Change. Glücklicherweise says the english Wikipedia-item something accurate, where really the trouble lying:
[quote:6a4bc8234d=Wikipedia (english)]The LGPL places copyleft restrictions on the program itself but does hardship apply these restrictions to other software that merely left with the program. There are, however, certain other restrictions on this software. Essentially, it must be possible for the software to be linked with a newer Version of the LGPL-bedeckten program. The most commonly used method for doing so is to use a suitable shared library mechanism for linking. Alternatively, a statically linked library is allowed if either source code or linkable object files are provided.[/quote:6a4bc8234d]
Perhaps can itself these circumstance Yes to some extent erfüllen - to that Beipiel because one together with the Program whom kompilierten code as PRC-File and a PCU-Version the Inc published.
is naturally only a idea - further thoughts moreover are very Welcome!
MfG
Sebastian |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 12/29/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | and because the Topic sau class is have I yesterday time rangesetzt and a class draus built.
I have but too yet what other verbrochen... I Have the border used circa a new XPSE-Funktionalität extensively To testing. The class lying means in a verbrecherischem XPSE-Style to - would me not wonder if I again so some Nackenschläge get 
I at least will be The Class benefit. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | [quote:a103efd1fa]is naturally only a idea - further thoughts moreover are very Welcome! [/quote:a103efd1fa]
you have whom Source yourself prepares, Sebastian. The copyright on the View source lying with you. even if You you on the originalen View source orientiert have, changes the nothing on it, that You whom Code reason on yourself prepares have. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | [quote:9a4a562957=Frank Abbing]you have whom Source yourself prepares, Sebastian. The copyright on the View source lying with you. even if You you on the originalen View source orientiert have, changes the nothing on it, that You whom Code reason on yourself prepares have. [/quote:9a4a562957]
Hmm... i don't know, whether the really so simply is. really think I already, that The Translation in a others Language one of ursprünglichen Program abgeleitetes Werk darstellt and accordingly How the Ausgangscode under The LGPL falls.
but How already said, if one together with the Program, the The MemoryModule.inc uses, whom code as PRC and a PCU-Version the Inc available position, müssten The Anforderungen IMHO really erfüllt his.
plenty plainer and klarer would The situation naturally, if the code LookupAccountName vorläge - but this is in this special drop naturally right futile... 
MfG
Sebastian |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 12/29/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | [quote:4acc38eb18]plenty plainer and klarer would The situation naturally, if the code LookupAccountName vorläge - but this is in this special drop naturally right futile... [/quote:4acc38eb18]
well true... |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| @Sebastian
Nutze still simply Version 0.0.2 instead of 0.0.1, where I The differences not at all found have. The falls under Modzilla Lizens, which rather qualify ought to
Greeting
Thomas |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | Hello Thomas,
[quote:9885ddb119=TS-Soft]@Sebastian
Nutze still simply Version 0.0.2 instead of 0.0.1, where I The differences not at all found have. The falls under Modzilla Lizens, which rather qualify ought to [/quote:9885ddb119]
super - thanks for Info! so How I the straight red have, consist The Problems with the less restriktiven MPL (Mozilla Public licensed) objectively not.
i'll whom code means so adjust, that it a Translation the Version 0.0.2 darstellt and it then hereafter here post .
MfG
Sebastian |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...] Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 12/30/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(850)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia