| |
| |
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | how'bout, if the something umgestellt and is with (probably/hopefully) little hoisted many new Opportunities created and be at the same time again Funktionstokens (or How that is) spare go.
it were prospective only yet MoveListTo(...) and MoveHandleTo(...). where one too the still only on MoveHandleTo(...) reduce could.
the sähe then so from:
Analog moreover:
so had one only two Containerfunktionen. one could even too MoveListTo(...) supplant, because with MoveHandleTo(...) too The zero as Parameter for interne list using go can.
in the Context would like I again allude, I it super would find, if these Strings not "" stand müßten. the same counts for whole Create(...)-functions. |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...  | 04/25/12 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | | Well - then are though not yet The MoveStrToList and MoveArrToList berücksichtigt. Perhaps would it already plenty bring, if one these directly on Listboxes o.ä. utilize could without whom detour over The interne list. |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 04/25/12 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | it were Yes none ID-lack if with a einfachen Präkompilierer-
Pass functions How follows transformed would:
funktionsname(...
f(1,...
MoveStrToList(...
f(2,...
MoveArrToList(...
f(3,...
thereafter would it unnötigt To pity Funktionsnamen zweckfremder To
name. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | | In X3 I'm going yet a step moreover and fasse any To Move() together! |
|
| |
| XProfan X2Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 09/25/14 ▲ |
|
| |
|
(910)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia