[*]Profan

- Page 2 -

RGH

Jacob Liebeck

@Roland: what say You To Getrusage?

Getrusage in the middle-aged shape (and the middle-aged names) becomes it definitiv not any more give, but I think a substitute to.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

09/19/07 ▲

Jac
de
Lad

Hm, Perhaps could Roland The COM-command (SetCom, OpenCom etc.) summarize To @com(, the fänd I well.

and moreover yet Emailversand with append and Emailempfang epr POP/IMAP.

Jac

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

09/24/07 ▲

Jac
de
Lad

Also fänd I nativen Support for Treeviews and icons in Listviews/Treevies/Comboboxen etc. well. the would the many Includes vereinfachen.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

09/25/07 ▲

Jac
de
Lad

So I feel me already integrally badly, I again what have, I gladly in XProfan 11 had:

i wish me, that it possible is, several Thread To produce and To talk and native functions, circa this Threads Prioritäten zuzuweisen. and too The verbesserungswürdige Callbacksituation would like I again short allude.
the further wären dynamic Arrays next to whom dynamic lists neither badly, I could it spontan for two programs use.

otherwise can ichs hardly expect, that The Email with the first Subscriptionversion eintrudelt. lever of Trackmenüs, dynamic lists and Prozessstatusmeldungen weg already.

yet ne question on Roland: is it at all meaningfully, The border dermaßen To strain?

greetings,
Jac

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Threadsicherheit stops I in reference on XProfan for Nonsinn there one if Roland whom Messagesverlust on The row get very well via Multi-processes the same produce can.

Dynamic Arrays Gibts in XProfan {2008|11}.

The expansion the border stops I personally for excellently particularly because less memory benötig becomes.

Jac
de
Lad

Hm, well, unfortunately missing me still The Possibility several processes at the same time run out To let. The Thread.pcu gives itself of course any trouble and is too well, functions but still not always.

Roland points in the Ankündigungthread the Neuerungen extra on it there, that it only with eindimensionalen Arrays goes, therefore have I lists written.

less Speicherverbrauch is natural utterly positively, How itself the on The performance auswirkt go we yet see.

Jac

PS: I have my Sub already order, comes hopefully soon on.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

several processes at the same time run out To let goes still integrally simply with shell par$(0)+ -meinAndererProzess.

Jac
de
Lad

Oach Come on, you kow what i mean. several Threads. The communication between several Instanzen of/ one application is tricky, slow, susceptible...therefore several Threads.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Yes so one balderdash!
The communication between Prozessen isn't absolutely slower komplizierter or anfälliger as The communication between Threads! How come You on something like?!

Jac
de
Lad

comes on it on How mans power:

SharedMem -> slow
Semaphoren -> umständlich
Files -> above ought to one none first cogitate

How otherwise?

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP