[*]Profan

- Page 6 -

Jac
de
Lad

I have in almost each Projektordner a File Test.prf. into write I shred to that testing mere (who had the virtual). sometimes füge I there quick yet at the beginning what new one circa it To testing and schließe with the progend ex (and can it then hereafter quick again Remove). The Compiler runs jedesmal by the complete File through.

The sense behind it is, I do not white, whom worth %ProgEnd has, if behind progend yet what standing: whom korrekten worth the Compilats or only To progend?

Jac

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

RGH

Jac

The Compiler runs jedesmal by the complete File through.

does it not. behind ProgEnd could You too Liebesgedichte or Kochrezepte stand having, without that the Compiler bleats. it reads of course The complete File one, but it compiled only To including ProgEnd. everything, what thereafter comes, alights not Compilations.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Jac
de
Lad

Hm, could the Compiler then not simply aufhören; means simply The File cut off (in the RAM)? then wärs faster. otherwise power it already the, I wants.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

RGH

Jac

Hm, could the Compiler then not simply aufhören; means simply The File cut off (in the RAM)? then wärs faster. otherwise power it already the, I wants.

it hears still on, once it on ProgEnd meets.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Jac
de
Lad

If I my 2000-Lines-Program go through let and at the beginning ne Messagebox have and a Progend runs the Parser nevertheless twice through. twice through any 2000 Lines...

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

RGH

Jac

If I my 2000-Lines-Program go through let and at the beginning ne Messagebox have and a Progend runs the Parser nevertheless twice through. twice through any 2000 Lines...

I have it straight once more tested: only at first Durchlauf, the reading, runs the counter naturally through any Lines, but at 2. Hochzählen end it at ProgEnd.
you are sure, that You ProgEnd correctly. written have?

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Jac
de
Lad

Yes, hm. OK, I can me brill, but the first is still too unnecessary, or?

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Rolands first Durchlauf stirs imho The Kompilerdirektiven through - means too $IFDEF-Zeugs.

would be To consider whether it Konstellationen gives in them Kompilerdirektiven to progEnd overlooking go can.

XPSE anyway stoppt not progEnd, if someone gigantic To übersehende Blöcke define would like möge derjenige the Blockrem /* blub */ benefit.

Jac
de
Lad

i wish me yet, that Window Style and possible Window Title Set()-functions go. the would well in that schema fit.

Jac

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

then still konsequenter:

set(Text,hWnd,Muhahaha)
set(Style,hWnd,512 | 8 )

So I personally had there gladly still a little bit Language.

I likes already create(Text not.

[offtopic]I kompensiere me the hold over xpse...[/offtopic]

Jac
de
Lad

Well, I thought on it, that it then too one Get(Window Style) were. the would sometimes not so bad.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

I voice with you above one, that a function getWindowStyle useful his can.

If I however considerate, that this solely a Umrechnungsfunktion would of api-getStyle to that xprf-Style stops I it only yet for little meaningfully - but Perhaps übersehe I something.

I could to that example overlooking the one these function use could circa of Windows - which one not self prepares has - a äquivalenten Window Style-worth to obtain, because To Windows which one self prepares has could one itself Yes eh whom Window Style remember. but Perhaps übersehe I still something - hilf gefälligst!