| |
|
|
H.Brill | Hello Roland, oftmals would it interestingly, The Number of Ersetzungen to know. there would a Systemvariable in example. %Translate well To use.
with whom regulären squeeze out would the too interestingly, the number of hits To detect. one can Yes a temp. String moreover using, so no Changes on the Original come off.
example : one has one String-aray[]. into individual Strings stand different Anzahlen of times (xx:xx). the can time a, two or three his. If I now with of/ one Loop by the aray go, could I now without Problems diejenigen rausfiltern, The z.B. three times having.
i think, there there certainly yet More Einsatzgebiete. at least would it a further inside Loop save. |
|
|
| Benutze XPROFAN X3 + FREEPROFAN Wir sind die XProfaner. Sie werden von uns assimiliert. Widerstand ist zwecklos! Wir werden alle ihre Funktionen und Algorithmen den unseren hinzufügen.
Was die Borg können, können wir schon lange. | 08/29/15 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Michael W. | Yes, zurückgemeldete Ersetzungen make indeed Editoren and on it can too often read, whether there something schief gone is. Z.B. if one The Number of Vorkommen knows and it go very plenty More Ersetzungen displayed.
For this. |
|
|
| XProfan X3System: Windows 8/10, XProfan X4 Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt. | 08/29/15 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Jörg Sellmeyer | Mh - can you still before integrally slight herausbekommen, or understand I what wrong? CompileMarkSeparation |
|
|
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 08/29/15 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
H.Brill | Jörg Sellmeyer (29.08.15)
Mh - can you still before integrally slight herausbekommen, or understand I what wrong? CompileMarkSeparation
the likes for simple Separator or. Ersetzungen Yes correctly. his, but How sees the because with regulären squeeze out from ?
what I mean : One Separator isn't absolutely the same, as the, I supplant wants. CompileMarkSeparation attempt still the time with Len(s$, "...") hinzukriegen. |
|
|
| Benutze XPROFAN X3 + FREEPROFAN Wir sind die XProfaner. Sie werden von uns assimiliert. Widerstand ist zwecklos! Wir werden alle ihre Funktionen und Algorithmen den unseren hinzufügen.
Was die Borg können, können wir schon lange. | 08/30/15 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Jörg Sellmeyer | well Yes - sooo heavy is not: CompileMarkSeparationSet("RegEx",1)
Var s$ = "XXX8:20xxx15:00YYYYY20:00yyyyy"
Var i% = Len(s$,"[]")
Print s$
Print Translate$(s$, "[0-9]{1,2}:[0-9]{1,2}", "[]")
s$ = Translate$(s$, "[0-9]{1,2}:[0-9]{1,2}", "[]")
print Len(s$,"[]") - i%
Waitin >
|
|
|
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 08/30/15 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Michael W. | ...and the then time on a correctly. large Text release...
Beautiful would it, if one some Translate$ wealthy would.
otherwise could I indeed InStr$ in a Loop run and the hits count. then is the Translate$ futile. |
|
|
| XProfan X3System: Windows 8/10, XProfan X4 Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt. | 08/30/15 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Jörg Sellmeyer | No - with the the InStr do you need even not To make, because Len the in a Slip Done. i know now not any more, whether Translate rekursiv operates. in the drop helps Len not further but otherwise might the relatively narrensicher and to some extent quick his. |
|
|
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 08/30/15 ▲ |
|
|
|