[*]Profan

RGH

in the next Subscriptionsversion can a UserMessage removes go, because one ihren negativen worth at commands User Messages uses: User Messages -16 would The 16 from the list the User Messages entfernten.
The new function isUserMessage(n%) would 1 zurückggeben, if The User Message n% existing and 0, as they not existing.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

I must absolutely a new Flyer with I LOVE XPROFAN ... increasingly! herzaubern!

Jac
de
Lad

where we strain at Delete are: can I,may I again short DeleteListBoxItem number% into space throwing?

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

then would it objectively to that first Male possible festzulegen what The response on a Message his should which z.B. of a Fremdprogramm abgesandt becomes. (communication of Prozessen among themselves)

the User Message-Topic would so slay and would completely new crazy Opportunities afford which itself letztendlich vereinfachend work out.

Jac

can I,may I again short DeleteListBoxItem number% into space throwing?

gladly, in another Thread! ;)

@Roland: now missing really only yet The Kleinigkeit the one determine can whom Antwortwert (long) the Transmitter of XProfanprogramm zurückbekommt as Result of Sendmessage on a User Message.

Simple example: If one would like the The XProfan WProc on The Message wm_activate with false answer (what now unfortunately you don't say so is) then ought to one
Compile Mark Separation

usermessages wm_activate=0

define can, or to eachone others Syntax How z.B:
Compile Mark Separation

usermessages wm_activate
setUserMessageAnswer(wm_activate,0)sinngemäß halt (könnte als Result im Übrigen den alten gesetzen AnswerWert zurückgebene>

RGH

now missing really only yet The Kleinigkeit the one determine can whom Antwortwert (long) the Transmitter of XProfanprogramm zurückbekommt as Result of Sendmessage on a User Message.

the have You naturally right. the building I another, where I the second suggested Syntax benefit will be, there tappt im dunkeln flexibler is. one can leichter in the Programmlauf The Antwortmeldung replace. though kürze I the Funktionsnamen a little bit: SetUAnswer(MsgNr%, Answer%). is MsgNr No, there a Error Message.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Jac
de
Lad

well, then back about User Messages: it go still some not relayed (z.B. if one Window moving becomes). Perhaps ließe itself there yet what make...

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Frank
Abbing

though kürze I the Funktionsnamen a little bit: SetUAnswer(MsgNr%, Answer%).

I suggest:
Set(UMessageAnswer, MsgNr%, Answer%)

Jau jau jau!

@Frank: so can We also the PSDK in the reference on The communication with XIDE something abspecken!

@Jac: the lying well unfortunately on something anderem...

<duck>jetzt missing really only yet that the XProfan The User Messages first "auffängt" and the aufgefangenen first with/with "Waitinput" abbaut - so no More lost weg.

</duck> (@Frank: then could we the ping-pong the Messages dispense and everything would yet sauberer walk...)

12/06/07 ▲

RGH

now missing really only yet that the XProfan The User Messages first auffängt and the aufgefangenen first with/with Waitinput abbaut - so no More lost weg.

OK, I have my lunchtime for a small, fixe MessageStack-Unit used and these installed. If you tonight (to the Eishockeyspiel the eagle) yet on are, can I you a first Version to that testing send. on the Syntax has nothing changed.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

12/06/07 ▲

Jawohl gladly! I login me simply by Schkeip if I at home be!

12/07/07 ▲