[*]Profan

someoneveryold

an idea would still, The Mathematikfunktionen complete in command umzusetzen. parallel naturally.
saving in manchen Programs of course only a couple Bytes, but rather, as the Procs self To write.

(PS: is it so ok, iF?)

07/24/05 ▲

Jörg
Sellmeyer

The transparente colour as additional (optionalen) Parameter with whom Bitmap-command and functions!!!
LoadBmp s, X,Y ;N[,$FFFFF][hr:e4f4ed0ba1][box:e4f4ed0ba1]edit of iF
this liesse itself very simply over set(SetTransparencyColor,rgb(0,0,0)) determine.[/box:e4f4ed0ba1][hr:e4f4ed0ba1]Nachtrag J. s.
No! because the would Yes programmweit. with my suggestion can each Image individuelle transparency receive. it would Yes not the what I me wish.

Compile Mark Separation

SetTimer -1

has The same effect How KillTimer.

One real lever the Memory bitmap and not the detour over Startpaint -1

Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4
... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...

08/03/05 ▲

René
Wagner

- strengeren Compiler, the z.B. not declared variables already during the Kompilierens anmeckert

- dissolution the Parameter of/ one method to the appeal, not first (How yet) with the Übernahme through parameters

Mit XProfan erstellte Freeware findet ihr hier: [...]

US World Domination Tour - bombing a country near you...

08/10/05 ▲

Jac
de
Lad

i wish me two functions:

Succ() and Pred(). The should for angegebene Variable whom Vorgänger (Predecessor) or. whom successor (Successor) spit out. the would some on code vereinfachen!!!

dynamic Arrays. the I will already long having. I mean so, that one The Size of a Arrays during the program runs change can (best too I really).

i think about so:
SetArray(aray[&|%|$|!],10,10)
SetArray(aray[&|%|$|!],a%,b%)

So I had gladly ne Override-function. so becomes a XProfan-function or -procedure detoured. example:

Override.inc

Override Create,OldCreate

Proc Set
Parameters what$,hwnd&,Text$,x&,y&,dx&,dy&
declare h&
what$=Lower$(what$)
if Equ$(what$,progressbar)
h&=Control(ms_progress32,Text$,$50000000,x&,y&,dx&,dy&,hwnd&,1001,%hInstance,0)
elseif ...
.
.
.
else
h&=OldCreate(what$,hwnd&,Text$,x&,y&,dx&,dy&)
endif
Return h&
endproc

this is now only time quick one zusammengeschustertes example. what I so my, is, that a function of Profan überschrieben becomes. in the example is tappt im dunkeln still over OldCreate abrufbar. in the normalen View source can now but too simply over Create(...) Progressbars prepares go. this is now really no sinnvolles example, but Perhaps is it meaningfully in the Context with Set()/Get() and Units. there could Perhaps even yet the Bezeichner ?_ entfallen. I hope your know I my...

One Statement the Community would me time interested!

Jac

well would find I instead of or additional To

Proc Irgendwas
Parameters a$,b%,c&,d!

NEW:

Proc Irgendwas(a$,b%,c&,d!)

the would a real relief.

Jac

Analog moreover would

endproc ret$

too meaningfully. your know already I my.

Jac

alas Yes, The Get/Set-functions could one Yes yet with Decimals strain, means I mean whom ursprünglichen Decimals-commands.

alas Yes and four command a la PutWord, PutLong and GetWord and GetLong to that reading/write of Words/Long in Files wären a real relief!

dynamic Units! then could one The latest Version always to Laufzeit integrate. would be for my News proposition lovely!

Erweiterte variables wären utterly well. means Int64 and 64bit-FLoat!

Ähm, right Threads! the would horny!

More Get/Set-command. I mean for things How USEP and so (for my News proposition very useful!

Ähhm, More as 15 Paramter for a procedure wären on not badly (I have a procedure, The 19 Parameter has, The had I now divide). Well, Perhaps not coercive necessary...

One strengerer Compiler would neither badly, I give to that example often The incorrect Paramterzahl on, then crashes the Prog at testing ex what about me white not Why. If the Compiler the already discern would, would some plainer!

Jac

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

08/23/05 ▲

RGH

i will now in loser follow Stellung To individual Wish take.

So I had gladly ne Override-function. so becomes a XProfan-function or -procedure detoured.

the would like I so not install. If each XProfan-function überschrieben/detoured go can, comes one with a Wuellcodeausschnitt not any more clear, if one not white, How which functions/command detoured get, etc. the chaos would vorprogrammiert.

but your border I will nevertheless aufgreifen: you goes it Yes therefore, to the functions with Unterfunktionen further Unterfunktionen hinzuzufügen, about with @Create or @Set. This will in XProfan 10 possible his:
Compile Mark Separation

!

SUBPROC Create.Listview

    Parameters <...>
    Return @Control(...)

ENDPROC

hLV& = @Create("Listview",...)....

with SUBPROC can means The functions with Unterfunktionen extended go.

Succ() and Pred(). The should for angegebene Variable whom Vorgänger (Predecessor) or. whom successor (Successor) spit out.

the would of course simply To release, but functions naturally only whom Variablentypen % and &. whether the The introduction zweier new Keywords rechtfertigt? A% = SUCC(A%) had then The same function How A% = A% - 1 or yet kürzer DEC A%.

alas Yes, The Get/Set-functions could one Yes yet with Decimals strain, means I mean whom ursprünglichen Decimals-commands.

the there already: @Set(Decimals,n%)

alas Yes and four command a la PutWord, PutLong and GetWord and GetLong to that reading/write of Words/Long in Files wären a real relief!

sound well! will be I drüber cogitate. the ought to no large trouble his.

Greeting
Roland

Arrghhh ... wieso becomes my Listing supra verunstaltet? I had the two Lines to SUBPROC eingerückt and naturally to the ENDPROC no Freizeile! and instead of Hlv& I had hLV& written. (I set in the rule one small h to whom names, if it a handle is.) what must I make, so my Text so displayed becomes, How I it write?

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Frank
Abbing

the lying on the automatischen Codeformer here. you have right, I feel it too sooner disturbing, as helpful.

@iF: can you in the Profile no attitude moreover take, whether code automatically format visible or not?

Frank
Abbing

[quote:7ecf515436]well would find I instead of or additional To

Proc Irgendwas
Parameters a$,b%,c&,d!

NEW:

Proc Irgendwas(a$,b%,c&,d!)

the would a real relief.

Jac

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analog moreover would

endproc ret$

too meaningfully. your know already I my.[/quote:7ecf515436]
this is really überaus helpful. I yourself have these Syntax for my XPIA already long übernommen and use for my Assemblerblöcke only yet these spelling.

RGH

[quote:cc9f3e53a4=Frank Abbing]the lying on the automatischen Codeformer here. you have right, I feel it too sooner disturbing, as helpful.[/quote:cc9f3e53a4]
Yes, the ought to abgestellt go. Syntax Highlighting and the automatic Onlinehilfe are against genial and should stay!

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Jac
de
Lad

Ahh, thanks Roland. the power me already whom mouth wässrig. I can now hardly yet schalfen, because I each day hope, that XProfan 10 into Startlöchern standing. Beautiful, that You on The Opportunities the Community eingehst, very lobenswert! there feel one itself rather treats as into most Delphi-Forums, where of course many Problems resolved go, but from integrally supra not plenty comes. Well, The having probably not plenty Time.

Jac

PS: With the Decimals have I do not seen. alas, and does me sorrow, I so many Opportunities have (Have strain again a dazugekritzelt)...XProfan is nevertheless solitary pointed!

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

Michael
Wodrich

i wish me The expansion the Objects on LongInt-Zuweisung.
there it the TypeOf() already gives should Yes intern with the Long-Variable stand, that tappt im dunkeln of type Object is.

me succeed it namely with the aray-Objects not, these To link.

example:
class SingleListElem = Next&, values#(20),SingleListElem@
class SingleList = Head&,modes@,...

One element the Head& allocate fails already. further items over the Next& pursue goes neither, as long as one one Objekt not on a LongInt allocate can.
the reading and Save the modified values can over modes resolved go. If XProfan here a interne Zugriffsprüfung spendiert becomes � la These operation with Objekt so you don't say so ought to it still weg...

Best wishes
Michael Wodrich

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

02/22/06 ▲

RGH

[quote:efaf76d330=Michael Wodrich]i wish me The expansion the Objects on LongInt-Zuweisung.
there it the TypeOf() already gives should Yes intern with the Long-Variable stand, that tappt im dunkeln of type Object is.[/quote:efaf76d330]
with the LongInt-variables standing intern quite nothing. and too one LongInt in the area(Objekt/structure) occupied exakt four Bytes, the TypeOf functions only Memory-Variables. with of/ one Zuweisung one Objektes a Longint (what Yes with einfachen reaches and Structures functions) went any Information over the Objekt except its address lost. what wished one so yet begin?

but ließe itself your trouble not solve, in the You a method Head@ write, the You as Parameter one Objekt the class SingleListElem commit.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

02/22/06 ▲