| |
|
|
- Page 1 - |
|
| here go Opportunities geäußert.
[box:174b705055]i wish me for XProfan10:[/box:174b705055] isset(a&) to that Verify whether a& declariert is unset(a&) to that undeklarieren of a& sort(aray[&|$]) / Sortierbefehle for Arrays Startpaint -1 needed no %hwnd More, and/or %hwnd (Mainwindow) can created go without in the Taskbar To attend hiword and loword in the Sprachschatz clearlist with lever as Parameter deletes Listboxinhalt .
salvo. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
- Page 5 - |
|
|
RGH | [quote:1e50undistinctive1e8=Clemens Meier][quote:1e50undistinctive1e8=iF]proc explode (char$,{mem#|string$}) zerstückelt by char$ a Mem# or a String$ in items which the int. Listboxliste angefügt go. becomes constantly used and a native Umsetzung would explicit faster. [/quote:1e50undistinctive1e8] Please too the Gegenstück, one proc implode (trennstring$,listboxliste|array) in a string$ or. mem# transfiguring. the käme Real well.[/quote:1e50undistinctive1e8] the there already! Look times under MoveListToMem and MoveListToStr$ to! what yet missing, would therefore MoveMemToList and MoveStrToList . time look ...
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 04/02/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Clemens Meier | [quote:5a8322f5c0=RGH]the there already! Look times under MoveListToMem and MoveListToStr$ to! what yet missing, would therefore MoveMemToList and MoveStrToList . time look ...
Greeting Roland[/quote:5a8322f5c0] Yes, but unfortunately only The Listboxliste. or there a function with the one Arrays directly in The Listboxliste copy can, circa then The Listboxliste in a String To transform? I have yet yet nothing in the manner found. Überhaupt is the works with Arrays very plenty needlework. Perhaps comes there Yes yet something. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | Oje, on it sees one time again, I not yet everything understood Have. I schaus me today same at times!
Jac |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 04/03/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | Hello Roland, I Have time again a ungewöhnliche question:
would be it Perhaps possible XProfan 10 in pieces To gliedern, means I to that example Datenbankkram and so me one commands integrate can (LookupAccountName) and the otherwise not finished Prog drin is (because it Perhaps not used becomes)? i think, the would Time and Speicherplatz save!!!
Jac |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 04/03/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
RGH | [quote:223c19a385=Jacob Liebeck]would be it Perhaps possible XProfan 10 in pieces To gliedern, means I to that example Datenbankkram and so me one commands integrate can (LookupAccountName) and the otherwise not finished Prog drin is (because it Perhaps not used becomes)? i think, the would Time and Speicherplatz save!!! Jac [/quote:223c19a385] Time saving it, at least in the compilierten Program and the finished EXE-File, not at all, if I single command and functions herausnehme and self The saving in the Interpreter is minimal and almost not measurable. and too The Platzersparnis isn't really relevant, the tappt im dunkeln explicit under 100 kB bliebe (see z.B. XProfan SE or PurProfan). In times, there on a volume mind. 128 MB (small USB-Stick from the clearance sale) and up to 4 GB (DVD) fit, might the no Topic his. and geZIPt for Download is the saving yet less, so that they self with one to some extent zeitgemäßem modem (are Modems zeitgemäß ?) hardly in that weight falls. there would it almost More bring, The whole in the actually Help as antiquated designated command and functions (z.B. teh folks functions, The inwischen through Operators supplant get) herauszuwerfen. but too the wouldn't really dramatische Verkleinerungen the Program effect.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 04/03/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| @Jacob: the Runtime is (geUPXt, Ressourcenfrei) small 200KB. the hiesse the 7 programs on a floppy disk fit. For which as yet small? [...] |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | Hm, is correct, selbt with ASPack Better get going concise 200kB. OK stupid idea...but Perhaps Better get going therefore faster???
Jac |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 04/03/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Nico Madysa | [quote:f157dc8111]but Perhaps Better get going therefore faster???[/quote:f157dc8111] Lies again very [quote:f157dc8111]Time saving it, at least in the compilierten Program and the finished EXE-File, not at all, if I single command and functions herausnehme and self The saving in the Interpreter is minimal and almost not measurable.[/quote:f157dc8111] I Have yet ne idea. Since I annehme, that meanwhile nobody More The 16-bit-Version of Profan uses, could you still The whole Kompabilitäten(z.B. %LFN) rausnehmen, or? therefore could again Space for new crazy ideas come into being. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Paul Niemand | Good idea! but when comes time again a new Freeware-Version out? XProfan 10 lite - with eingeschränkten Funktionsumfang... but funktionstüchtigen Compiler/Linker.
XProfan 10 share sound namely thick - of my opinion to. too The Profan-HP could time updated go, too optisch could tappt im dunkeln time frisiert go. what becomes from the aide-Rubrik? The standing already at least since Profan7 empty. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| so itself Roland around the core concern can (and not circa Websites unso (is really no its strengthen )) Gibts Yes The .COM - and the bid of my opinion to all Members More as sufficient Opportunities a) on offers access and b) Own new offers anzubieten. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Paul Niemand | I denk the community is the Using Entwicklern for Entwicklern? The Profan-HQ is Newszentrale...
or crazy I there integrally vast? well alike, before we that here into Off-Topic transform... ->Antworten hierauf Please by PN[hr:01fa0922ff]iF says: I answer time here - otherwise takes the Offtopic Überhand. Offizieller XProfan-Support happens on XProfan.de. on the .com goes it there something suitor To, for is the tender grosszügiger there any dran mitwörkeln. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RGH | [quote:6c6c0f0aab=Nico Madysa]I Have yet ne idea. Since I annehme, that meanwhile nobody More The 16-bit-Version of Profan uses, could you still The whole Kompabilitäten(z.B. %LFN) rausnehmen, or? therefore could again Space for new crazy ideas come into being.[/quote:6c6c0f0aab] These items are already funktionslos. it'll hold only for provided, that old Sourcen, The these items include, no Error Message produce. %LFN gives always 1 back and SETLFN bewirkt nothing, or. becomes in the latest Version How REM behgandellt. (therefore becomes one Befehlstoken spare.)
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 04/03/06 ▲ |
|
|
|