XProfan

- Page 2 -

E.T.

(momentarily can only one very eingeschränkter Personenkreis on the service zurückgreifen.)

what about me thought already, i'm To stupid, the to find...

If something like only for a "eingeschränkten Nutzerkreis" is, should the but too igendwo vermerkt go. i'll finally with the Bubble-blowhole jedesmal on it bumped, come but never to there !! Ggf. should then too The "Bubbles" only whom "sehr eingeschränkten Personenkreis" hereon there point, and all the rest of them, The eh not "mitspielen" can, too none hereon there point.

Manno!

I have still just of Roland not The release whom "Service" everybody in current version available To to put. it's located me remote of/ one Unternehmung to to go, which Roland not absegnet. and I in the example Online-Compiler too against The license verstoße Please I simply circa regard, without the Topic in the "Geheimen" discuss To must. (what Yes sure neither sense the thing his can...)

in the Fußbereich standing the Online-Compiler already since couple Meet... [...]

E.T.

I want indeed only time on it allude.

and How I today already elsewhere written Have: alas, what Have I today again for a nice code mood...

[offtopic] sometimes isses but too to that "aus the skin fahren", and if I still so NEN Schwachsinn of Krümel read...[/offtopic]

but alike, i'm Yes (gottseidank) seldom so one Stinkstiefel..

E.T.

but alike, i'm Yes (gottseidank) seldom so one Stinkstiefel..

alas pity, the Stinkstiefel has still what.

i'm to that example always "stinkig". look - now too:

E.T.

Yes well, but sometimes freu I hold on it, circa these Time on "XProfan-Login" in my FF To clicking. If one there but too yet (Krümel-) Schwachsinn expects (and that with 5 of 8 "gebubblten" Topics), then becomes one hold yet stinkiger.

but I mean, we should "Krümel" time again correctly. shake. because the it normal Sätze write can and meaningfully contribute can, has it already proved.

very, nothing against Krümel - who gegenkrümelt must first on us past!

RGH

Grömple!

If Roland his "OK" gives, then can this Online-Compiler for Profan²7.6a "wegen meiner" everybody available stand.

Well then: OK!

and what me fallen would, would another little Aufmöbeln the Online-"Entwicklungsumgebung", How about Save the Source code under beliebuigem names, Changing the Dateinamens, Perhaps even Syntax Highlighting and Onlinehilfe, How into Codefenstern?

And if The thing adopted becomes, could I me present, whom Onlinecompiler on Version 8.0a hochzustufen and everybody spare To give.

Greeting
Roland

should You having Roland!

Jupp, the Online-Compiler functions: [...]

small Syntaxhighlithing, Files Save, Loading and Remove.

circa IE have I however (yet) not aimed gekümmert.

12/13/08 ▲

Nico
Madysa

Online-Compiler

it exists one testweises Limit of 500 Lines

*hüstel* "Testweise" is a adverb and can no Substantiv begleiten; just as, as too no "heutes Limit" or "gesternes Limit" gives. rather would "testbedingt" or "... because itself this feature still in the Testphase befindet..." , or Ähnliches.

PS: How me straight auffällt - "weise" is a solches Limit anyhow not - not more than necessary.

12/15/08 ▲

Frank
Abbing

Nico, i think, you are well someone, whom one in the Volksmund a [...]

name...

12/15/08 ▲

Nico
Madysa

i want solely, that the community on Neulinge a good local power and not through umgangssprachliche Error glänzt - though this naturally show would, that the Text of Menschenhand written is.

12/16/08 ▲