| |
|
|
Jörg Sellmeyer | Hello Rolf, If I the ROC a couple minutes walk have disappears The Tool-groin integrally simply. Vorzugsweise then, if I one Objekt not aufziehe separate only on a Sttelle click. thereby comes it then To Grafikstörungen on my Desktop. I have me straight The actually Version of your HP pulled, circa time so one little To testing and then the Greeting Jörg |
|
|
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ... | 07/29/05 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| Owei - hopefully ließt Rolf with - I know he's in the momentum very engage with outercomputerischen Things. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Timotheus | by me very that same trouble. but only under Win 98. there dismisses it itself after a designed Time. alike whether one slow or quick clicking, to about 20 sec disappears the Roc-Window, and diving not any more on. Vieleicht lying it on it, that the Fokus so often changed becomes.
Timo |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| [quote:3e710d69cb=Timotheus]Vieleicht lying it on it, that the Fokus so often changed becomes.
Timo[/quote:3e710d69cb] sooner not. under NT-based Windowssystemen runs The Speicherverwaltung differently ex, as under windows95/98/ME. where under 95/98/ME to that example heftiges chaos arise, if one with DELETEOBJECT things deletes, everybody can so none delete must (type here unbesehen sooner on something in this manner), happens NT/2000/XP quite nothing. against it are but 95/98/ME with not closed Handles integral tolleranter as NT/2000 and XP.
To glasuben, Windows=Windows is a angry entrapment. Taskswitsching, Registryhandling, Dateimanagement, Access to Handles, consumption of Resources, Multithreading and XP even the Messagehandling -> everything (something) differently! I have unfortunately to my leave not any more enough Time, me ROC to examine - there Rolf but over windows98 verfügt, becomes it whom Error In any drop find... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Alfred Wagner | So I faith the trouble must on the Betriebssystem lying
by me under Windows XP runs Roc 4.2 correct
Regards Alfred |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Hello Alfred...
See supra. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rolf Koch | Hi and finally again thereby with my new DSL this point nervt me since the Update on the most. I must time look, I can make. Evtl. my 98it system on Qemu (Emulator) run and there The development perform. Schaun me time.
Nachtrag: Habs strain under 98 tested. could it really understand. I thought after a couple Mails The I got, that ROC abstürtzt under 98. sees not so from, because the Arbeitsfenster is Yes yet present. solely afer a long rumklicken becomes it cache. I teste then time moreover. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rolf Koch | [quote:89445b09cb]Hello Rolf, If I the ROC a couple minutes walk have disappears The Tool-groin integrally simply. Vorzugsweise then, if I one Objekt not aufziehe separate only on a Sttelle click. thereby comes it then To Grafikstörungen on my Desktop. I have me straight The actually Version of your HP pulled, circa time so one little To testing and then the Greeting Jörg[/quote:89445b09cb] I hope, that I this Error already eliminating could. In this case might it on whom andauernden inquire and Neupositionierungen the Werkzeugfensters lain having. Have it found out, there WinSpy me The X-Koordinate suddenly with -128 angab. this yields itself through %maxx-128. Irgendwas setting under Win98 (XP not) %maxx on 0 and yielded naturally then this worth.
now Search I time to the Speicherfresser, which with different Klicks in irgendwelchen situations increasingly memory uses. If I something gedimmt had and not released had then dürften XProfan and others Überprüfer well with me meckern. it'll with Click (z.B. into Combobox to that list already erstellter Objects) o.ä. too no Objekt (Dummy or so) prepares. therefore question I, wieso with Click into normales Objekt the memory hochgeht and not again reset becomes. If I one new Objekt create, then is it Yes clear, that the memory higher goes, but if really only one Click vorliegt. time look, or has of/ one ne idea?
Rolf |
|
|
| |
|
|