XProfan

even if for XProfan unüblich - so would XML well the Passenste. I remember (for and) XProfan already a XML-Parser written to have - only on The performance vermag I not To remind.

Perhaps. would one simples TXT ala:

root
_file_typ_item
_file_typ_item_additionalInfos

plainer To manage.

XPDB sound well, and naturally can I me present the XPSE one XPDBF uses, but too XIDE for Projektexplorer.

Sebastian
König

Hi,

not at all so simply, itself of a Linux-system from with Iceweasel einzuloggen... my FastLogin-Link funktionierte somehow not, so I me first one new Password procure had...

iF

even if for XProfan unüblich - so would XML well the Passenste. I remember (for and) XProfan already a XML-Parser written to have - only on The performance vermag I not To remind.

XML was in the doing my first thought and the actually XPDB-Arbeitsversion created The spending already in this stature (I wished only in my first Posting to the Topic not yet To very in that detail weg and first general opinions to the Topic run down...). If I hereafter home be, I will time a example-spending, How I tappt im dunkeln me yet vorstelle, post. The speed the Parsers ought to no trouble his, think I. Also becomes a function to that reading the Files too part the Projekts his, so it not at all absolutely necessary his becomes, a own Parser To write (but naturally possible, there the stature Yes offengelegt and well documents go should).

iF

XPDB sound well, and naturally can I me present the XPSE one XPDBF uses, but too XIDE for Projektexplorer.

Yes, me gefällt the name too! If too The XIDE the stature benefit would, would the naturally super!

MfG

Sebastian

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

H.Brill

Yes, XML would too for me properly, there this stature too very famous is.
straight for diejenigen (too I), The with several Programmiersprachen
works, bid itself the on.

Benutze XPROFAN X3 + FREEPROFAN
Wir sind die XProfaner.
Sie werden von uns assimiliert.
Widerstand ist zwecklos!
Wir werden alle ihre Funktionen und Algorithmen den unseren hinzufügen.

Was die Borg können, können wir schon lange.

Sebastian
König

so, here So how promised More Information:

How already erwähnt, is the Speicherung in the XML-stature The of me favourisierte and already implementierte Variante. One with the actually XPDB-Version erzeugtes example have I under appended (objectively go already Information To Procedures stored, but the have I to better Übersichtlichkeit here time omitted...)

probably is the code so already very simply To understand, but nevertheless a couple Notes:

each gespeicherte element is a object - the yielded itself integrally directly from of my internen classes-Hierarchie.
circa what very it itself deals, standing in the Attribut type, so counts to that example 1=Include-File, 2=Header etc.
what in name standing is in the Grunde discretionary, ought to itself but in the rule automatically from the analysierten code yield
the Attribut id ought to within eachone File eindeutig his.

next to the prerequisite, that it itself circa gültiges and wohlgeformtes XML deal must, would I additional following terms on whom construction suggest:

The attributes type, id and name are Pflichtangaben for each Objekt, The indicated parent in the Grunde too, only not for Hauptdatei the analysierten Codes
Objects, on which somewhere related becomes (to that example in the parent-Attribut), must in the File VOR the Referenzierung stand. (so becomes vermieden, that one whom code by Multi-Pass-take action parsen or Referenzen later detect must. in the rule ought to The circumstance with the sequentiellen analysis one Projekts automatically erfüllt his, but to hardship could one it too without large hoisted at Save the XML-File ensuring.)
The ID-count must within eachone File with 1 begin. (the relieved ggf. the join of Databases.)

Additional to the (duty-)Attributen, The directly in the < object > -day stand, can tributary of type too further Information stored werden; I name these then values. One example would level for Include-Files, the The Verschachtelungstiefe angibt. too here could one tributary of type Pflichtangaben desires.

generally find I, that so little indicated How possible to duty declared go should, around the Verwendungsmöglichkeiten the data base-Files very generally stay. If one to that example just The a Unit exportierten Procedures describe would like, is the Attribut line sure not too meaningfully...

OK, so much first To my recent thoughts... there moreover so far opinions, suggestions or Einsprüche?

MfG

Sebastian

with XPDB erzeugter example-code:
Compile Mark Separation

<?xml version=1.0 standalone=yes?>
<xpdb>
<header>
<version>0.1</version>
<generator>XPDB Alpha 0.2</generator>
</header>
<object id=1 type=1 name=XProfEd.prf>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100SourceXProfEd.prf</file>
<level>0</level>
</object>
<object id=2 type=2 name=windows.ph parent=1 line=4>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100Includewindows.ph</file>
</object>
<object id=3 type=2 name=messages.ph parent=1 line=5>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100Includemessages.ph</file>
</object>
<object id=4 type=2 name=commctrl.ph parent=1 line=6>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100Includecommctrl.ph</file>
</object>
<object id=5 type=2 name=structs.ph parent=1 line=7>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100Includestructs.ph</file>
</object>
<object id=6 type=1 name=RGHToolbar.inc parent=1 line=11>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100SourceRGHToolbar.inc</file>
<level>1</level>
</object>
<object id=7 type=1 name=XPrfEditClass.prf parent=1 line=12>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100SourceXPrfEditClass.prf</file>
<level>1</level>
</object>
<object id=8 type=2 name=XPrfEdit.ph parent=7 line=2>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100SourceXPrfEdit.ph</file>
</object>
<object id=9 type=1 name=LetzteDateien.inc parent=1 line=13>
<file>D:ProgrammeXProfan100SourceLetzteDateien.inc</file>
<level>1</level>
</object>
</xpdb>

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

solid Pfadangaben in a XPDBF?

it missing too one Parameter URL, accordingly could one projektabhängige Files describe which pub not at all on disk are - or. Includes and Units describe which of Importer hold first loaded would... (I had for XIDE eh angeplant)

Nachtrag: i'd too same to the Header not whom Objects begin, here missing a further Kapselung.

Michael
Wodrich

sees well from and is verständlich.

not so as Delphi and VB Projektdateien, where one not time MIT manuals durchsteigt.

XML-NotePad freut itself too over the stature.

Best wishes
Michael Wodrich

Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt.

Frank
Abbing

can you please times accurate explain, for what these Files end meaningfully are?

Sebastian
König

The previous approval to that XML-stature freut me first!

solid Pfadangaben in a XPDBF?

With the whom Pfadangaben have I first temporary so made... is probably really not always meaningfully. I could me well present, here by a indicated in the Header (absolute,relative,none) several Opportunities to admit.

too a optional URL-indicated in the Header is a good idea.

iF

Nachtrag: i'd too same to the Header not whom Objects begin, here missing a further Kapselung.

is correct - I will install.

EDIT: what is correct because here with the Zitaten not?

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

The URL related sooner on one Dateiobjekt.

with the Quotes is everything IO, you had only behind one Quote (and to the Gleichzeichen) one Freizeichen with installed, and [quote = blub] there not what iFBB in the reference aufs Quote to that turn off constraint.

@Frank: I could you a such XML give - You open these in XIDE - XIDE läd and orders any Files the Projektes on The right place. such a File describe z.B. Aufenthaltsorte of Projektzugehörigen Files and Settings. the must we XIDE of course yet procure, but I think of ASM-Core since Gibts there nothing new hinzuzufügen - should heissen - everything over Plgs possible.

I had Yes so or so to very these Funktionalität into XIDE hineinzukatapultieren - Stichworte proposition-assistant/Explorer - vlt. takes Sebastian us thereby something work ex.

(presupposed his Parser shrug not XPSE-Codes and understand these likewise How normal XCodes.)

Sebastian
König

Frank Abbing

can you please times accurate explain, for what these Files end meaningfully are?

to that example to Description of Unit-Inhalten. Zugegeben, here there already already mentioned .def-stature of XPSE, but one flexibles, generally unterstütztes stature stops I somehow for a good idea.

my ursprünglicher plan was, simply a Browser for structure of XProfan-Projekten To write - as i hereon coming, that one The ermittelten Information too Save can ought to (circa not always whom whole code parsen To must), verlagerte I the Schwerpunkt the Projekts the Dateiformat. somehow pleased me The idea... The is naturally not new! One little watts so did i from the Browse-Information, The my Visual C++ generiert, inspired.

the bring me same to that next point, whom too iF already addressed has: XIDE could the stature benefit, circa Information To Projekten To Save. at that Opening a Projekts could then very quick the structure be read, without that the whole code once red go must. with Changes must then only The data base in memory updated and be at Closing the Projekts becomes everything again into File written. prerequisite for these application is naturally, that one such proposition-Browser part the IDE his should... (Information moreover there Yes yet hardly)

too Zusatzprogramme How to that example Debugger could Perhaps a such proposition-data base profit...

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]