XProfan

- Page 2 -

Jac
de
Lad

Dass ME steady is can I weder confirm yet understand. I have with everything to XP only negatives Experience made (except 3.11, but the standing not to Debatte).

I drive incidentally a 16 years middle-aged Renault.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

02/13/08 ▲

@Jac
too I have with ...ME only good Experience made. unfortunately has Redmont but the splint NT weiterentwickelt and therefore was then ...XP too for me due . The operating of ...XP and the tempo this Systemes were rather ! -
the best WINDOWS was no WINDOWS, separate DOS 6.2 - the was stabilste system, I apiece using have. be since DOS 3.2 thereby.

Frank
Abbing

Bedienerfreundlicher are XP and Vista neither straight become.

still. and leistungsfähiger, stabiler, runder.

The finazielle Page is Yes no Topic and verständlich, but 95/98/ME are Garbage for Tonne and who today yet behauptet, these seien rather been as new Betriebssysteme, ought to its Scheuklappen time take off and the Augäpfel putzen.

Waschmaschinen are too teuerer and schwerer To manage as Waschbretter. nevertheless stand tappt im dunkeln in each household...

@Frank

[offtopic]

Waschmaschinen are too teuerer and schwerer To manage as Waschbretter.

expensive is correct , but schwerer To manage ? - have You already time one Waschbrett bedient ? - I already what about me can you say, the Buckel and the knuckle tuen you afterwards integrally beautiful painful - (I speech not a Dixiland-volume, which the Waschbrett under Zuhilfenahme of Fingerhüten to that Schlagzeug umfunktioniert has) separate of right Waschtag - was with of my mother's and me always thursdays - there become You each washing-machine as The crown the technical Weiterentwicklung standing ;) [/offtopic]

To ...ME - had windows these splint weiterentwickelt, would today no human with ...XP or ...VISTA works. - and would Apple not so schlafmützig been, would its system today federführend. The had namely already The bedienerfreundliche surface, as we later windows-User us yet with the `Prompt on irgendeinem black DOS-screen herumschlagen mussten. -

RGH

Hi,

i think, It's all right not therefore, which Betriebsssystem rather or not.

Dietmars border is it, if I it right understand, that even not any computer in its computer-cabinet XP-tauglich are and not any in the site are, time even 400 Euro for a XP-tauglichen computer loosly To make. and who computer in use has, The not 500 MHz quick are and not mind. 256 MB memory equipped are and Festplatten under 10 GB get along must, for is of my Erachtens z.B. Win 98SE The better Solution. straight in the schulischen area finds one yet often such Konfigurationen. and many families are glad, as they ihren Kindern wenigsten a yet to some extent funktzionierenden older Rechnern for a couple Euro hinstellen can. and - for a example from of my Bekanntschaft To name - one Win98-computer with 233 MHz and 32 MB RAM with of/ one 800-MB-Festplatte is rather as nothing and runs under Win98 with of/ one older Office-Version right slippy and steady. (and XProfan 10 would too free from problems on it walk.)
(If one on USB-Support dispense could, w ary too NT4 for betagte computer a very stabile and very preiswerte alternative*, but oftmals can even not hereon dispense.)

Dass Microsoft not The Win95-splint, separate The NT-splint weiterentwickelt has, was logical, there NT Yes the of reason on as 32-bit-system developed system was, during under the surface of Win95/98/ME still DOS- and 16-bit-Structures werkelten. already NT4 and 2000 galten under EDV-Profis as extreme steady and XP watts these engineering too for Home-users introduced. for me shining XP the bislang best windows To his. (with Vista can I me not yet anfreunden; especially since my Hauptrechner and some programs and Peripherie not Vista-suitable are.)

concise: XProfan becomes too in Version 11 yet under windows 95/98/ME correct functions, even if I me at program some interesting newer APIs verkneifen must and manches time More needlework is announced. and straight XProfan 11 minimizes through its dynamic Speicherverwaltung whom Speicherbedarf of XProfan-Programs, so that they on one Win95-computer with 16 MB RAM yet free from problems walk would.

Greeting
Roland

* NT4-Lizenzen there used oftmals for little Euros, though becomes USB only for Mäuse and Tastaturen, not but for externe volume supported. though should it too for NT already at least 64 MB RAM his.

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Sebastian
König

Puh, a such Discussion wished I with the scherzhaft gemeinten remark sure not trigger!

as attempt to Friedens-Stiftung here a Why stay, How one possible a similar display the belegten Speichers under Win9X/ME release could:

with whom Toolhelp-functions there Heap32ListFirst() and Heap32ListNext(). in the of these functions gefüllten structure HEAPLIST32 there a entry dwSize. in the principle should one itself means duch any Heaps one Prozesses hangeln and the sizes aufaddieren... I know but unfortunately not, how much the over the objectively belegten RAM aussagt, there indeed yet the Prgrammcode self, diverse data and the Stack memory occupy, the then possibly not counted becomes.

MfG

Sebastian

Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11
Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]

Alte Profan²-Seite: [...]

Jac
de
Lad

the likes Yes correctly. his.

nevertheless have I personally for me decided, not devil's komm out everything 95/98/NT-compatible To make. and too Win2000 let I, if necessary, outside to. Sofern it possible is use I I always functions, The either on 95/98/NT in similar shape vorkommen or I let whom user know, that function XY not functions or that the Prog for 95/98/NT not suitable is or I building one if one, that abfängt, if 95/98/NT installs is and then The function skipping.

even if some people (from different Found) yet 98 use, sometime must time the Schlussstrich pulled go. Roland has the already with 3.11 made (to Version 6.6). what about me think, that with XProfan 12 or 13 too the Support for 95/98/NT/ME frail go could.

Jac

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

GDL

Hi,

only Billy vergrault itself with his Anwenderbevormundung increasingly customers.
once Reactos in the Betaversion is, verabschiede I too of neueren Windowsversionen.by then must XP long.

Hello
Georg

Windows7 Xprofan 8,9,10 [...]

[...]

Jac
de
Lad

the pflüchte I with.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

- Page 3 -

Roland has the Topic from of my visibility weitestgehend completely correctly slay.

On not-zeitgemässen Computern would I either Win98SE (and only SE! not ME!) run or - sometimes rather - a Linuxdistribution How z.B. Kanotix.

Jac
de
Lad

the what SE supported is too in ME drin.

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

...Yes, but unfortunately not only. ;)