| |
|
|
- Page 1 - |
|
| How big must The Runtime to Time his?
The question is means: rather a with functions vollgeproppte 2MB-Runtime, or NEN enger 1MB cincture.
The Gürtelvariante has whom benefit the The Runtime (means letztendlich The exe) small is, but the programs slower walk because it möglicherweise on performancebringenden functions missing
The PropperVariante is hold (to Umfrageergebnis) MB big, for walk The programs but faster the it many functions gives which nativ exist. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
- Page 5 - |
|
|
RGH | GDL
accordingly has again each Program its Runtime and come not in that enclosure?
correctly!
it'll of course no EXE created, but for each PRC becomes The Runtime anew into memory loaded, so that the programs not in that enclosure come can.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 11/07/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
GDL | Hi Roland, have it in another Thread already written. These Version goes but only if both code different Variablennamen benefit.with equal Variablennamen comes The Error Message double deklaration.
Hello Georg |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RGH | GDL
Hi Roland, have it in another Thread already written. These Version goes but only if both code different Variablennamen benefit.with equal Variablennamen comes The Error Message double deklaration.
Hello Georg
No, the can't his. there must with you integrally elsewhere the worm drin his. but the diskutieren we in the erwähnten Thread moreover.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 11/07/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| {community.offered.votemessage.1} |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| against understand I the Uwe too fully and integrally.
where one for z.B. a single Messagebox too well Profan6.6 take could.
Letztendlich remaining there yet The Possibility the MiniRuntime (without everything, without ogl dbx ftp brabbel and co) and the Megaruntime (<2mb?) für SpieleProgrammierung und Software die eh 10+MB groß wäre. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| {community.offered.votemessage.1} |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Christian Schneider | In my eyes is Profan not for made particularly quick, squat or sonstiges To his. mainly goes it still around the light Erlernbarkeit. The is on the ehesten given, if as many as possible functions nativ include are (what The Runtime zwangsweise aufbläht). If it circa kompakte, performante Applications goes, there geeignetere Languages.
I bezweifle time, that itself here people because of the performance for Profan decided having.
where I naturally too nothing against a variable Size through kompilierung had ;) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Dietmar Horn | Christian, very this is it!
with XProfan can sowohl Achtjährige whom Entry into windows-Programming find, just as How over Achzigjährige! and too Profi-Programmer How z.B. iF feel itself with XProfan evident not so bad aufgehoben.
and the to a invincible günstigen Price for Full Version!
my yet ältester XProfan-schoolboy was 84 years young been - and he had utterly no Problems so had everything To kapieren, though it before yet never what with the program To do had having.
On any Cases is XProfan one lovely springboard to that Entry into right windows-Programming. there verzichte I gladly on the last Kick on Ausführungsgeschwindigkeit.
of my opinion to has Roland with XProfan a lovely Kompromiss between all o.g. Extremen this Threads found - the ought to and becomes too prospective certainly so stay!
Klitzekleine demand on Roland:
What is because really from Your former PurProfan-proposition (or so similar) of to some years become?
have You, the meanwhile eingestampft, or werkelst You yet busy on it around? might not possible one tender for people his, The with the actually XProfan-Syntax smaller ones Tools (with kleinerer EXE-Filesize) without Use the other XProfan-Ballastes (the normalen Runtimes) create would?
Greeting Dietmar |
|
|
| Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...] Windows 95 bis Windows 7 Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...] | 11/07/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| {community.offered.votemessage.1} |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Uwe ''Pascal'' Niemeier | Hello people!
I wanted to squeeze out, I The attitude Why should I me The to give trouble, my Program To tense/optimieren; it has still eachone HighSpeed-DSL and ne fat Festplatte for wrong stops, and of course sowohl on Profan related as well as on so developed programs.
naturally ought to Profan everything include, what necessary is (what the exactly, above can itself quarrel). but it ought to not everything circa each Price reingepackt go, only because it machbar is.
of my opinion to becomes The work with Profan ex one designed Befehlsumfang tougher go, because one any nose long take after must, which Opportunities one at all has.
and learn basiert indeed on challenge, otherwise could one indeed irgendeine Schieb & Click = ready-Programming-Language use. and best learn one from whom own Fehlern, means ought to one too opportunity having, to which make
Nochwas about: what's the score because with the Possibility, a or several Includes with auszuliefern, in them The einfacheren things gekapselt are (analog to the Macros another Programmiersprachen, The Yes mostly in Klartext exist)?
SeeYou Pascal |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Dieter Zornow | i think this is no so schlechtes concept, is very with Profan akin, has a extreme small Runtime and functions etc, even DLLs go with want eingebunden. www.thinkrelative.de
greeting from Bangkok
Dieter |
|
|
| Er ist ein Mann wie ein Baum. Sie nennen ihn Bonsai., Win 7 32 bit und Win 7 64 bit, mit XProfan X2 | 11/08/07 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| sees thereafter from as if one Purebasicprogrammierer time a PiCoSprache program wished. (anyway reminds me The Syntax heavy on PureBasic - what about me mags not.) |
|
|
| |
|
|