| |
| |
|
| - Page 1 - |
|
 | How big must The Runtime to Time his?
The question is means: rather a with functions vollgeproppte 2MB-Runtime, or NEN enger 1MB cincture.
The Gürtelvariante has whom benefit the The Runtime (means letztendlich The exe) small is, but the programs slower walk because it möglicherweise on performancebringenden functions missing
The PropperVariante is hold (to Umfrageergebnis) MB big, for walk The programs but faster the it many functions gives which nativ exist. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| - Page 6 - |
|
|
| Nachtrag: there But Freeware is could it one toller Interpreter to Disclosure his, only The Syntax is hold cheese.
(Schade the Roland me in the reference on The XProfan.Exe not so right understood having - on it To discern the it not crying Yeha so make wirs.  ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | | {community.offered.votemessage.1} |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | {community.offered.votemessage.1} |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | {community.offered.votemessage.1} |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | {community.offered.votemessage.1} |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | | is only a straight arisen, unausgereifte idea - but how'bout, if the Compiler on designed Schlüsselwörtern recognize, what into Program eingebunden go must? comes The oGL()-function to, so must with more Passagen with oGL calculated go, and so the Compiler whom oGL-Part the Runtime hinzulinkt. just as with db() etc. the had though whom disadvantage, that therefore naturally the Compilieren longer last would (what already long last can, gelle Dietmar? ~ ). |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | this is not the trouble! The problem is rather the Roland X different Runtimes kompilieren and mitliefern should. the wären many IFDEFs in Rolands code what most likely many new Problems aufwirft. here's benefit/hoisted means unverhältnismäßig. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | No No, The Runtime remaining always dieselbe. but anhand of designed Schlüsselwörtern (what the now konkret is, is first alike) recognize, which pieces the Runtime needed and be which not. so, now correctly. framed?  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | i get it what You want, but technical seen would it then for each Kombinationsmöglichkeit a Own Runtime there XProfan The Runtime Yes not compiled separate Roland this does. One to remove of individual sharing from the Runtime - So one nachträgliches alter of/ one Exe - is the XProfan-Compiler you don't say so and anyhow one Topic the itself hardly abtun can. without the one The Exe präpariert is it IMHO you don't say so a Exe To restrukturieren without new To kompilieren, i'm anyway this no take action famous. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer |
No No, The Runtime remaining always dieselbe. but
what iF say wants, is, that Rolands code itself verkompliziert, there it Yes these whole unterschiedlichen Implementierungen somehow in its code inquire must. there it Yes The whole Bibliotheken at Compilieren of his XProfan in a Slip einliest, should it itself a Methodeausdenken, The different element already as fertiges Module compiliert mitzuliefern and with want nahtlos into jeweilige Exe einzubinden.
I fänds class but n bunch Mehrarbeitfür Roland, wealth I. |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...  | 11/09/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | well OK, Have me already virtual, that the ne Schnapsidee was.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | {community.offered.votemessage.1} |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(1.121)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia