| |
| |
|
 | sometimes ought to one not only walk listen, what in a proposition rather can make, separate it does too well to know, what correctly. made has => For this is this Thread.
what gefällt me to profane?
I find The simple Syntax really inspired. I, the former not plenty More as C64 Basic learnt has, could me without Problems and further Vorkenntnisse The Language erlernen and still (so think I) right nice Applications write.
too The Helpfile is right well been successful and with extensions has one the new Syntax quick out.
The Possibility APIs einzubinden, find I class. together with the Simplicity the Syntax are self for Programmieranfänger How I of/ one be things possible, on them itself some Informatiker in others Languages slight The teeth verbiegen would.
The speed has under XProfan9 amazing correct.
Insgesammt: Mach moreover so, Roland  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | in the Grossen and whole voice I Andreas To. Profans Befehlsumfang is already vast.
only The speed was me always one thorn in the eye. as C64-Basic-and-Assembler-Starter i was even always little more dwelt. since XPIA is the but story and Profan+extensions stops I for optimal suitable, good programs write to.
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | is correct, The speed, however these is Yes only in conscience Berreichen disturbing (and for ham me Yes you  ).
normal Applications entrapments Geschwindigkeitsabhängig (except one must zig thousand data process) not so bad from.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| particularly well find so did i The Profan Freeware, The a Entry and a try possible power, without same money on the table lay To must.
If Roland now really too yet Version 6 to Freeware power, would the wonderful - The supply already a right good local of Profan. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Sebastian
König | i want too again on The Possibility the Geschwindigkeitssteigerung with Profan2Cpp allude ...  |
|
| |
| Windows XP, XProfan/Profan² 4.5 bis 11 Profan2Cpp-Homepage: [...]  Alte Profan²-Seite: [...] | 09/09/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | | naturally, Sebastin. I said already, Profan+extensions. under falls indeed Profan2Cpp. take off diejenigen particularly interestingly is, The ausschliesslich with Profan program. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | [quote:70972ae3bc]and - DLLs to create...[/quote:70972ae3bc]
what Yes with XPIA too possible is  . |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | The speed is usually enough. Dass I no DLLs create can, is mainly only problematically, if one with Profan in others Languages works wants. within Profan works the Yes with Units integrally well. I rule slow correctly. well Delphi, but Profan is for me still The first electoral, because it simply is. there must one not 20 things initialisieren and first 50 Komponenten install, separate it functions everything of attempt on, its even very simply. but it has too enough command for correctly. professionelle Applications. and by the extensions, mainly as DLLs (i want time Prospeed, List view, EasyVent and Graphamp name, The for me in the momentum The most important are) is everything adere possible, what Profan of Nature not can.
concise: i'm there and lane. Profan, wed me!!!
Jac |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 09/09/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Jörg
Sellmeyer | I finds class, that one whom code same in the Interpreter perform can. If I z. B. einigeDateioperationen the
equal manner manage wants, can I me quick one Program zusammenhauen undschon is the Whole in shortest Time Done. |
|
| |
| Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...  | 09/09/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Uwe
''Pascal''
Niemeier | Hello people!
me reizt to profane straight the, of what House from you don't say so is.
therefore is one forced, over the own Tellerrand hinauszublicken and z.B time with MSDN To rummage about, Newsgroups To search, Codes from others Programmiersprachen To interpret etc.
on the end has one with something skill a Solution and white even, How tappt im dunkeln functions (in the Gegesatz To others Languages, in them one stumpf any Module zusammensteckt without to know, what eigendlich does)
I know Programmer, The not time know, wieviele Bits one byte has...
therefore are most Neuerungen the last years eigendlich too no real Neuerungen, separate only Vereinfachungen
SeeYou
Pascal |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | | Uwe - You promise me in many sharing from the soul! Tolles Posting! |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(838)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia