| |
| |
|
 | what would if The XProfan.Exe Freeware would?
The question set I me strain...
one could these into own Programs use circa z.B. a Untersprache anzubieten - or circa freiprogrammierbare Plugins produce.
here goes it only around the Interpreter!
it would too so the so some for the time being on the buy of XProfan and would give with the XProfan.Exe would program - and then but Profan.Exe with Prf transmit should.
Fazit:
a) The Prf-Files (The Source) would itself More get around - on Rechnern of not-program. The Profan.Exe-User would itself warscheinlich a Exe building let (ne or in an emergency bat) The his Program with the Profan.Exe same aufruft. it know but the its Version runs more slowly as a compiled Version
b) one could XProfan simply transmit - and of course not only a eingeschränkte Version - separate a Full Version the Profan.Exe. (sound simply rather!)
c) Roland had it plainer because to that buy were it hold only whom Compiler. it would so a Freewareprogrammiersprache (plenty more currency) where one solely The option has too a ExeKompiler buy to so The own programs hold faster are and without code delivered go can.
XProfan self would not at all More commercial (what many abschreckt) separate solely the Compiler.
would be then so looks:
Download XProfan 10 Full Version
Buy XProfan Compiler (Optional)
If Roland the interestingly finds then would so did i suggest The weitergabeerlaubte Profan.Exe in XProfan.Exe umzubenennen. ;)
what means your lieg I wrong? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Christian
Eichler | The Idea is of my opinion to not so bad. though would I warscheinlich but for all that with my Profan 6.6 stay, because, How You already said have, no Possibility exists, exe - Files create.
I bezweifle too, that the prf - Codes sonderlich get around would, there it Yes for many normal - PC - User plenty To tricky is, with the Profan.exe herrumzuhantieren.
Dass it rather sound, is correctly., but, if then rauskommt, that one no exe - Files create can, becomes The joy on this Profan - Version only be short.
what You to have, iF, sound for me How Profanscript ...
but I could me even present, that then even the XProfan Compiler More sales would ...
---> One attempt wärs In any drop worth ! If it nothing bring, can Profan with the *next* Version again complete sell !
mfg Christian |
|
| |
| Debian Lenny, Intel Celeron 2,8 Ghz, 768 MB Ram && Win XP Pro, Intel C2D 1,66Ghz, 2 GB Ram ... PROFAN² 6.6 | 07/05/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
I bezweifle too, that the prf - Codes sonderlich get around would,
well sure but More as now there it now none reason gives to which get around - whom reason it then but were.
Dass it rather sound, is correctly., but, if then rauskommt, that one no exe - Files create can, becomes The joy on this Profan - Version only be short.
Rauskommt is wrong because it standing clear there: BUY Compiler
, sound for me How Profanscript ...
...is what other - ProfanScript is the WebVariante of Profan².
but I could me even present, that then even the XProfan Compiler More sales would ...
think I me too. ;) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | Hello David,
such a thing there were already once, presumably to your Time, and hieß ProBat and bestand in the integral from Entwicklungfsumgebung, Interpreter and Helpfile (the bat ought to on Batch-Language = Interpreterspache hindeuten). The Resonanz hereon was, softly-softly words, sooner shy. an Programming-Language, with the one no EXE-Files create can, shining little interest To rousing.
(BTW: it given seinerzeit too of others Herstellern Interpretersprachen for windows, its Interpreter free, the Compiler but optional and with costs was. too of it hears one already long nothing more. an the bekannteren was WinBatch.)
whom others from you named aspect (Untersprache) I had already time angedacht (and even already almost ready set), where I there a DLL prepares having, with the one Profan-Source perform could. These DLL would even not Profan programmierten Programs make possible, Profan as Untersprache, or. Batchsprache To use, about for Plugins, etc.
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 07/05/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | Well, The Tasache, that WinBatch yet existing, say nothing over its currency from. ;)
Hm, have I about To niedrige prices? After the Motto: what little cost, is little worth . what nothing cost, is nothing worth. 
but no afraid, I let me of this Preistabelle not inspire.
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 07/05/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| Hm You sheer  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(1.128)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia