| |
| |
|
| - Page 1 - |
|
 | what would if The XProfan.Exe Freeware would?
The question set I me strain...
one could these into own Programs use circa z.B. a Untersprache anzubieten - or circa freiprogrammierbare Plugins produce.
here goes it only around the Interpreter!
it would too so the so some for the time being on the buy of XProfan and would give with the XProfan.Exe would program - and then but Profan.Exe with Prf transmit should.
Fazit:
a) The Prf-Files (The Source) would itself More get around - on Rechnern of not-program. The Profan.Exe-User would itself warscheinlich a Exe building let (ne or in an emergency bat) The his Program with the Profan.Exe same aufruft. it know but the its Version runs more slowly as a compiled Version
b) one could XProfan simply transmit - and of course not only a eingeschränkte Version - separate a Full Version the Profan.Exe. (sound simply rather!)
c) Roland had it plainer because to that buy were it hold only whom Compiler. it would so a Freewareprogrammiersprache (plenty more currency) where one solely The option has too a ExeKompiler buy to so The own programs hold faster are and without code delivered go can.
XProfan self would not at all More commercial (what many abschreckt) separate solely the Compiler.
would be then so looks:
Download XProfan 10 Full Version
Buy XProfan Compiler (Optional)
If Roland the interestingly finds then would so did i suggest The weitergabeerlaubte Profan.Exe in XProfan.Exe umzubenennen. ;)
what means your lieg I wrong? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| - Page 3 - |
|
|
 | |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| I Have whom local Roland dislike because of Found The it not name would like. catch we means on with guessing game. 
I werf time in space: Roland becomes of mysteriösen ultrasonic based Aliens gefoltert The it einreden the cruel forces XProfan from the Zeitschleife katapultieren unless it not exakt not does what utterly not incorrect would.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
RGH | i think above to!
but red me to a little Time. it must in the doing some bedacht go.
From OGL-Basic there Yes z.B. too a Freeware-Version: OGL-Basic PE. The has though too a Compiler and can EXEn produce and is so very near on the commercial usable Version of OGL-Basic, too what operating, Development Environment, etc. concerns. Perhaps would one XProfan PE (Freeware) a alternative to a XProBat:
As I said: i think above to. before map I but another Schulversion of XProfan 10 To basteln.
Since I this year in the leave not wegfahre, have I soon something More Time as in the momentum.
Greeting
Roland |
|
| |
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 07/06/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
Christian
Eichler | what Nico there said has, can I only confirm.
i'm already happens, that itself one teacher on of my school itself over Profan jolly made has.
(because it means, that it Java can, rausgestellt has though, that it it still not really can). |
|
| |
| Debian Lenny, Intel Celeron 2,8 Ghz, 768 MB Ram && Win XP Pro, Intel C2D 1,66Ghz, 2 GB Ram ... PROFAN² 6.6 | 07/07/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| | Java can is well hardly one feature - even so little How Asm, Basic or C can. who with of/ one Programming-Language program can is for me yet long no Programmer. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Ne nay without Posting.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | Why are You against it Michael? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
(1.109)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia