XProfan

- Page 5 -

Nico
Madysa

too only one graphic-Error:
1.) I open a code
2.) I make a new and write what mere
3.) secure whom new code
4.) lead whom new code from and finish it again
5.) in the Window becomes suddenly the old boy code Piece for Piece displayed,
means only in eachone row, on The I then click. sees sooner unschön from.

P.s.: is the now Hohn of you, that your wend to the antiquated command schiebt, let but not?

Nico Madysa

[quote:27b2bcb3b4=Nico Madysa]P.s.: is the now Hohn of you, that your wend to the antiquated command schiebt, let but not?

[/quote:27b2bcb3b4]
Let has Bestandsschutz!

Jörg
Sellmeyer

Perhaps not directly one bow but nevertheless:

with very long Lines reicht sometime the horizontale Scroll bar not any more. there XProfan10 Lines of 32000 process can should some hundred in editor representable his, or?
with iFs code ([...]

) can the well testing.

Greeting
Jörg

Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4
... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...

RGH

[quote:e4dd5f20f3=Nico Madysa]P.s.: is the now Hohn of you, that your wend to the antiquated command schiebt, let but not?

[/quote:e4dd5f20f3]
Why ought to LET antiquated his? one can whom commands of course omit, but intern standing it then still there. The integrierte Präcompiler, the except for The Operator-functions already now The old Syntax into new Syntax Translated, building at Compileren whom LET-commands to eachone Zuweisung one.

Apropos integrierter Präcompiler: too in the Interpreter becomes The old Syntax, with exception the Operatorfunktionen, at reading automatically into new Translated. Wundert you means not, if The Error Message in the row the new Syntax shows, during in the Source yet The old standing!

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

Nico
Madysa

After this Logik can wend but too drinbleiben and intern in EndWhile transformed go.

PS: i'm another bow with whom Hexadezimalen numbers noticed.
comes to the dollars one character (A, B, C, D, E or F) then can behind it without Anmeckerung the Editors eachone others character written go, as long as no numbers follow. simply testing:
Compile Mark Separation

Def %Bemaengelung1 $0FFFGGG
Def %Bemaengelung2 $FFFGG2GG
Def %Bug $ABCEFGHIJKLMONPre>

Nico Madysa

not bow! I had for care the möglicherweise too System-Variables recognized go - the have You well overlooking

Nico
Madysa

I have it already red, but have in the momentum the discovery not dran virtual.

OK, I faith, I kriegs there, hexadezimale numbers correctly. To write.

Nico Madysa

RGH

[quote:5baa87b76d=Nico Madysa]After this Logik can wend but too drinbleiben and intern in EndWhile transformed go.

[/quote:5baa87b76d]
Oh, the make I already since etlichen versions so! The Runtime knows already since Ewigkeiten no Wend More!

[quote:5baa87b76d]PS: i'm another bow with whom Hexadezimalen numbers noticed.
comes to the dollars one character (A, B, C, D, E or F) then can behind it without Anmeckerung the Editors eachone others character written go, as long as no numbers follow.[/quote:5baa87b76d]
The Lexer screen evident only whether The first digit to a numerischen Literal belong could and takes then on, that the remainder too fits. there but Stringkonstanten naturally too with A-F (and theoretical even 0-9) begin can, should with %, & and $ always the entire expression darufhin to check on, obs one numerisches Literal is.

Greeting
Roland

(iF, Please not cut! ;) )

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

The Lexer screen not only The first digit - but these takes it as Indiz! the Indiz can nevertheless aborted go ifs one Keyword is, and ifs no Keyword is and not whom Nummernkreis fit Better get going yellow...

there's hold System-Variables which with $ & % begin, the power The whole thing not simply. I faith I have the Bestmögliche rausgeholt where too The performance tenable is.

Entscheident is for me the a korrekte Syntax correctly colored becomes, and a möglicherweise incorrect Syntax often recognized and geGelbt becomes.

Nico
Madysa

[quote:3130888738]Oh, the make I already since etlichen versions so! The Runtime knows already since Ewigkeiten no Wend More! [/quote:3130888738]
then can you the Wend still drinlassen

. the Tausendstel the Tausendstels of/ one tausendstel Millisekunde(evtl. a little bit exorbitant

), the the Compilieren / interpret longer lasts, becomes certainly niemanden disturbing.

Nico Madysa

RGH

[quote:92898715cf=iF]Entscheident is for me the a korrekte Syntax correctly colored becomes, and a möglicherweise incorrect Syntax often recognized and geGelbt becomes.

[/quote:92898715cf]
I agree you naturally 100%ig right! but What is with folgedem example:
Compile Mark Separation

!Def $ABCDEFGHKLLLL = 67

The Sybtax is correctly, The tint behauptet but, the $ABCDEFGHKLLLL be one numerisches Literal, take off whom aufmerksamen Programmer one Info is, that it its Constant so not name must. objectively is But no Literal, there with Hexzahlen only The letters A-F allows are.

Greeting
Roland
(white, that it in the momentum etas nervt ... ;) )

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4