| |
|
|
| question to that Lexxer:
The moderne XProfan (grins) has there still so a or others demand on the Highlightening.
what must I do around the MultizeilenRem /* */ and the // -Rem as well as The additional Compilerdirektiven in geschweiften clinging { } (How Delphi) discernible To make?
i'd only ungerne hereon dispense - what about me can me present so many XPSE -User ditto. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | Have of course no response, but DAS To syntaxhighlighten (or syntazuhighlighten) have I me always desired!
Jac |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 09/18/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| [quote:eca5e435a2=Jacob Liebeck]Have of course no response, but DAS To syntaxhighlighten (or syntazuhighlighten) have I me always desired!
Jac [/quote:eca5e435a2] Well my lieblingsIde is Textpad, I highlighte so already all DIES.
(See attachment) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RGH | [quote:54a13e0802=iF]what must I do around the MultizeilenRem /* */ and the // -Rem as well as The additional Compilerdirektiven in geschweiften clinging { } (How Delphi) discernible To make?[/quote:54a13e0802] there müßtest You you whom Source the DLL fetch, a suitable C++-Compiler install and the DLL adjust ... or first time TS-SOFT ask, whether it there Opportunities sees. ;)
I have by me self unfortunately no Development Environment, The for DLL suitable would.
Greeting Roland |
|
|
| Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4 | 09/18/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| now if The DLL one C++ proposition is then ists no trouble. PB however have I do not. (not my thing)
Thomas has whom actually Source?
Thomas could You, the Please install or whom Source rüberschubsen? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| www.scintilla.org The lexer for PowerBasic becomes uses. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| so ok The SciLexer.Dll produce is Yes now not the trouble - but hilf me - what must done go so The DLL of XPrfEdit adopted becomes? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| I look me derweil times the exports on... |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Ah! Conventions... I known still there was what.. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| [quote:569c49b962=iF]so ok The SciLexer.Dll produce is Yes now not the trouble - but hilf me - what must done go so The DLL of XPrfEdit adopted becomes?[/quote:569c49b962] XProfEd!, XPrfEdit Gibts not any more Umbennenen, then becomes tappt im dunkeln adopted. Konstanten, Farbwerte etc. voices but not any more, there the jetzige Version the Lexers from the middle-aged Version vastly distinguish. to middle-aged Version existing but no Source. best a new Lexer write, LookupAccountName, these must then the following functions export: [quote:569c49b962]GetLexerCount GetLexerName Lex Fold[/quote:569c49b962] loaded becomes this Lexer then vaguely with: CompileMarkSeparation plenty Fun
Gibts here no normalles Quote |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| to middle-aged Version existing no Source?
How is the because happens? |
|
|
| |
|
|