XProfan

Jac
de
Lad

Have of course no response, but DAS To syntaxhighlighten (or syntazuhighlighten) have I me always desired!

Jac

Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP

[quote:eca5e435a2=Jacob Liebeck]Have of course no response, but DAS To syntaxhighlighten (or syntazuhighlighten) have I me always desired!

Jac

[/quote:eca5e435a2]
Well my lieblingsIde is Textpad, I highlighte so already all DIES.

(See attachment)

beispiel.html	32 kB

Hochgeladen:	09/18/06

Downloadcounter:
		Download

RGH

[quote:54a13e0802=iF]what must I do around the MultizeilenRem /* */ and the // -Rem as well as The additional Compilerdirektiven in geschweiften clinging { } (How Delphi) discernible To make?[/quote:54a13e0802]
there müßtest You you whom Source the DLL fetch, a suitable C++-Compiler install and the DLL adjust ... or first time TS-SOFT ask, whether it there Opportunities sees. ;)

I have by me self unfortunately no Development Environment, The for DLL suitable would.

Greeting
Roland

Intel Duo E8400 3,0 GHz / 4 GB RAM / 1000 GB HDD - ATI Radeon HD 4770 512 MB - Windows 7 Home Premium 32Bit - XProfan X4

now if The DLL one C++ proposition is then ists no trouble. PB however have I do not. (not my thing)

Thomas has whom actually Source?

Thomas could You, the Please install or whom Source rüberschubsen?

www.scintilla.org
The lexer for PowerBasic becomes uses.

same time look...

so ok The SciLexer.Dll produce is Yes now not the trouble - but hilf me - what must done go so The DLL of XPrfEdit adopted becomes?

I look me derweil times the exports on...

Ah! Conventions... I known still there was what..

[quote:569c49b962=iF]so ok The SciLexer.Dll produce is Yes now not the trouble - but hilf me - what must done go so The DLL of XPrfEdit adopted becomes?[/quote:569c49b962]
XProfEd!, XPrfEdit Gibts not any more

Umbennenen, then becomes tappt im dunkeln adopted. Konstanten, Farbwerte etc. voices but not any more, there the jetzige Version the Lexers from the middle-aged Version vastly distinguish.
to middle-aged Version existing but no Source.
best a new Lexer write, LookupAccountName, these must then the following functions export:
[quote:569c49b962]GetLexerCount
GetLexerName
Lex
Fold[/quote:569c49b962]
loaded becomes this Lexer then vaguely with:
Compile Mark Separation

SendMessage(hsci&,~SCI_LOADLEXERLIBRARY,0,"deinelexerdll.dll")
SendMessage(hsci&,~SCI_SETLEXERLANGUAGE,0,"XPROFAN")e>

plenty Fun

Gibts here no normalles Quote

to middle-aged Version existing no Source?

How is the because happens?