XPSE

- Page 5 -

Dietmar
Horn

clear - somehow have You so indeed right.

I use these Vorgehensweise but occasionally nevertheless, because XProfan (unfortunately) none Compilerschalter for bedingte Compilierung knows, How the in others Programmiersprachen the case is.

Greeting
Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]

02/28/05 ▲

Hi, iF!
[quote:75c6004837]
The following standing namely of/ one tidy Programming against:

if 1
proc pla
endproc
else
proc pli
endproc
endif
[/quote:75c6004837]
Spräche really something against following Vorgehensweise - without whom switch {$nosectioncheck}?

if 1
pla
else
pli
endif

in this Konstellation go The Procedures pla and pli still only in lieu of one (longer) Quelltexts inserted, circa for More Overview To care.
or concerns the only whom drop, if I pla and pli in a INC unterbringen would?

Greeting, Christian

XProfan 8/9.1, Win XP, AMD 64/3200

02/28/05 ▲

It's all right only around the Deklarierung of Procedures within ifs[whiles[repeats[etc...]]] - not around the Perform of Procedures.

The following mind XPSE and reports ggf. a...

Sektionsfehler:
Compile Mark Separation

if
proc

endif

endproc

if
proc

endproc

endif

proc
if
endroc

endif

while
if

wend

endif

It's all right simply therefore, the XPSE something strenger as XProfan-self is - so itself less Error into Source smuggle can.

salvo, iF

02/28/05 ▲

Dietmar
Horn

Hello David,

XPSE V0.1.3.p finds Incude-Files not, if behind it until Zeilenende one comment standing.

without comment go The INCs however found.

Greeting
Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]

The thing take I gleichmal on.

Hm, I teste grade

$I input.inctest

and there gibz nothing Error.

too with
Compile Mark Separation

 $I inputtest
 $I input//test
include inputtest
#include inputtest
include input//test
#include input//test

runs nothing schief.

Ahhh, I see with
Compile Mark Separation

include input/*Test
*/
or
 $I input/*Test
*/

gibbed whom Error - mean You, the?

means the /* */ Rem power Error Compilerschaltern hmpf

Kla - heard korrigiert.

salvo, iF

Jauix.

Dat part is schlimmeliger as ik thought.

Et concerns The whole compilerschalter which not /* */ ausklammerbar are.

the Prob is that I in this step all Operationen not simply the RemKilling set can - since the Strings on the Pos (at invite in the Mem) yet freigelegt are.

Dat becomes grauselig...fields...

salvo, iF

Dietmar
Horn

Hello David,

the following works by me:

$I C:VEREINDHOXPROFAN9FORTSCHRITT.INCTEST

and the too:

$I C:VEREINDHOXPROFAN9FORTSCHRITT.INC TEST
(Hochkamma through space abgetrennt)

If I however the Hochkamma by a tabulator abtrenne - only then working not More.

Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]

understand - is today yet fixed.

salvo, iF

Dietmar
Horn

thanks,

now works it finally again!

Aufgefallen is me the really first in the Context with the Compilerschalter for bedingte INC-Einfügung with therein encompassed PROCS.

whom Compilerschalter this stops I as always for superfluously, very as strengere Syntaxüberprüfung in this point.

of my opinion to ought to not The task one Programmautors his, The users its software in irgendeine direction herumerziehen To want. usually runs the anyhow against whom tree (see GOTO-Discussion, or over The thing with several command in a row in the RGH-Forum).

as long as it in XProfan none right Compilerschalter for bedingte Compilierung gives, has these Vorgehensweise of my opinion to your Legitimacy: what z.B. in a Trial none first in the code drin is, the bläht the program not unnecessary on (and can also none first gecrackt go).

Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]

You i don't know very what you mean.

XPSE should too niemanden bring up - It's all right therefore the Error one Sources auffindig To make circa maximum Interpretationsgenauigkeit To Produzieren.

at that Proggen there severity regulate - but what erzähl I you.

its sure wrong if one Compiler the following allows:

proc
if
endproc
endif

there not vorhersehbar is wied it Code PRFVersion To Version interprets becomes. its means unclear - what against against each shape the Programming speaks.

but I faith therefore I ment you not - I have you well not correctly. understood.

salvo, iF

Dietmar
Horn

Hello David,

I wealth, there having both of us eachone a morsel of right - or us capable mißverstanden.

as temporary Substitute for bedingte Compilierung meant I solely a structure in following manner:

if testversion%
proc pla with Content 1
endproc
else
proc pla with Content 2 <> Content 1
endproc
endif

or if need be:

if testversion%
proc pla
endproc
else
proc pli
endproc
endif

where then the Call the PROCs naturally ditto over again a IF-ELSE-ENDIF-request on testversion% necessary would, The not angemeckert go might. the ought to too at use of XPSE allows stay.

anyway, as long as it in XProfan yet no others Possibility for (real) bedingtes Compilieren gives ...

The others from you named Konstruktionen should naturally too furthermore of XPSE angemeckert go, as long as RGH or. his Compiler not yourself power.

Greeting
Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]