XPSE

- Page 5 -

Dietmar
Horn

Hello David,

the following works by me:

$I C:VEREINDHOXPROFAN9FORTSCHRITT.INCTEST

and the too:

$I C:VEREINDHOXPROFAN9FORTSCHRITT.INC TEST
(Hochkamma through space abgetrennt)

If I however the Hochkamma by a tabulator abtrenne - only then working not More.

Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]

understand - is today yet fixed.

salvo, iF

Dietmar
Horn

thanks,

now works it finally again!

Aufgefallen is me the really first in the Context with the Compilerschalter for bedingte INC-Einfügung with therein encompassed PROCS.

whom Compilerschalter this stops I as always for superfluously, very as strengere Syntaxüberprüfung in this point.

of my opinion to ought to not The task one Programmautors his, The users its software in irgendeine direction herumerziehen To want. usually runs the anyhow against whom tree (see GOTO-Discussion, or over The thing with several command in a row in the RGH-Forum).

as long as it in XProfan none right Compilerschalter for bedingte Compilierung gives, has these Vorgehensweise of my opinion to your Legitimacy: what z.B. in a Trial none first in the code drin is, the bläht the program not unnecessary on (and can also none first gecrackt go).

Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]

You i don't know very what you mean.

XPSE should too niemanden bring up - It's all right therefore the Error one Sources auffindig To make circa maximum Interpretationsgenauigkeit To Produzieren.

at that Proggen there severity regulate - but what erzähl I you.

its sure wrong if one Compiler the following allows:

proc
if
endproc
endif

there not vorhersehbar is wied it Code PRFVersion To Version interprets becomes. its means unclear - what against against each shape the Programming speaks.

but I faith therefore I ment you not - I have you well not correctly. understood.

salvo, iF

Dietmar
Horn

Hello David,

I wealth, there having both of us eachone a morsel of right - or us capable mißverstanden.

as temporary Substitute for bedingte Compilierung meant I solely a structure in following manner:

if testversion%
proc pla with Content 1
endproc
else
proc pla with Content 2 <> Content 1
endproc
endif

or if need be:

if testversion%
proc pla
endproc
else
proc pli
endproc
endif

where then the Call the PROCs naturally ditto over again a IF-ELSE-ENDIF-request on testversion% necessary would, The not angemeckert go might. the ought to too at use of XPSE allows stay.

anyway, as long as it in XProfan yet no others Possibility for (real) bedingtes Compilieren gives ...

The others from you named Konstruktionen should naturally too furthermore of XPSE angemeckert go, as long as RGH or. his Compiler not yourself power.

Greeting
Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]

- Page 6 -

OK - i see and see it one.

i'll the Abprüfen of if;proc;endproc;endif Remove.[quote:0561ce5d0c]as long as RGH or. his Compiler not yourself power[/quote:0561ce5d0c]there I will short jump in.

Rolands Compiler is - say we so - not the fastest. me ists rather xpse bleats after a couple Millisekunden the what not is correct - as the Rolands Compiler in line 95.000 NEN Error finds.

*duck*

salvo, iF

Dietmar
Horn

lovely!

hopefully reads Roland yourself here occasionally with ...

*duck*

Greeting
Dietmar

Multimedia für Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene - MMJ Hoyerswerda e.V. [...]

Windows 95 bis Windows 7
Profan² 6.6 bis XProfan X2 mit XPSE

Das große XProfan-Lehrbuch: [...]

No- unfortunately not.

look here who here already red has: [...]

under - in the Minitoolbar is a eye - there is obviously who already the Topic red has.

salvo, iF

Stephan
Sonneborn

Hi iF,

after I my Program with the XPSE V0.1.3r have prekompilieren let, shining the CREATE-bow, if mehrdimensionale Arrays as lever vorkommen, gefixt To his. thanks!!!

now to that next trouble:

from
Compile Mark Separation

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
SplashScreen erzeugen (1 sec anzeigen)
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
WINDOWSTYLE (1+2+8+16+32+64+512)
SplashScreen& = CREATEWINDOW(%DESKTOP, "", 0,0,300,300)
SETWINDOWPOS SplashScreen& = (%MAXX-300)/2,(%MAXY-300)/2-300,300;-1
STARTPAINT SplashScreen&
DRAWPIC FlashBitmap&, 0,0;0
ENDPAINT
SLEEP 1000
DESTROYWINDOW(SplashScreen&)
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------span>

power the XPSE
Compile Mark Separation

WINDOWSTYLE (1+2+8+16+32+64+512)
SPLASHSCREEN&=CREATE("WINDOW",%DESKTOP, "", 0,0,300,300)
SETWINDOWPOS SPLASHSCREEN&=(%MAXX-300)/2,(%MAXY-300)/2-300,300;-1
STARTPAINT SPLASHSCREEN&
DRAWPIC FLASHBITMAP&, 0,0
0
ENDPAINT
SLEEP 1000

what is correct not? correctly.! the Semikolon in the DRAWPIC-commands becomes as Befehlstrenner recognized and schiebt The 0 into new row. follow: The XProfan-Compiler beschwert itself. with 0 can it nothing begin. its To Verify, whether the too The others Bitmap-command concerns...

Schöne Grüße aus Wittgenstein
von Stephan

Programmierumgebung:| XProfan X4 | WIN10 | AMD FX6100 3,3 GHz

03/18/05 ▲

Yehhaa - many Thanks Stephan!

likes gugn which command Roland there yet eingeschmuggelt has which NEN Semikolon in the Syntax benefit.

salvo, iF

small hint on the Rande:

from WINDOWSTYLE (1+2+8+16+32+64+512) mach rather WINDOWSTYLE (1|2|8|16|32|64|512)

03/19/05 ▲