| |
| |
|
Frank
Abbing | Hi,
thanks first for the {$runtime} 
now what, what me recently first noticed is.
adopted, I definiere a API function:
CompileMarkSeparation
now would I the Text but rather through one Strings transfer, what but not functions:
CompileMarkSeparationtext$="KERNEL32"
Def CopyMem(3) !text$,"RtlMoveMemory"e>
i'd the but need, I whom Dll-names extern Generate would like.
would be the possible To release ?
Wohlmöglich with höherer Proirität  ? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Achso, you mean means not aufm XProfan-ways, separate a manner replace function ala XPSE?
Joar Frank, at all quite no trouble.
Something like can I offer? (*hoff*correctly.*understood*Have*)
CompileMarkSeparation {$replace 1:"KERNEL32"}
{$replace 2:Def}
{$replace 3:"KERNEL16"}
{$replace 4:"RtlMoveMemory"}
{$replace 5:CopyMem}
Def ^5^32(3) !^1^,^4^
^2^ ^5^16(3) !^3^,^4
Virtually between ^^ The number the as $replace definierten String, where however not within strings geschaut would!
In Your concrete example hieße the well:
CompileMarkSeparation {$replace 1:"KERNEL32"}
Def CopyMem(3) !^1^,"RtlMoveMemory"
Something like ok?
-
the had naturally too to follow, the XPSE after XPIA drüberging again the enh nab must. this is Yes yet not the case, but so be it then.
Perhaps have I the whole but only fehlverstanden. These Variant naturally for a automatic Erzeugung well suitable, if You however something user/programmierer-freundlicheres rather would have, red I me what to occur.
then could one z.B. something like make:
CompileMarkSeparation {$replace Text$:"KERNEL16"}
Def CopyMem(3) !Text$,"RtlMoveMemory"
would have been but to follow, the XPSE gnadenlos (except in strings How always) The phrase Text$ supplant in KERNEL16.
there would against warscheinlich the following reeller:
CompileMarkSeparation {$replace textlol:"KERNEL16"}
Def CopyMem(3) !%textlol%,"RtlMoveMemory"
iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | [quote:1a6fd24ba5]Virtually between ^^ The number the as $replace definierten String, where however not within strings geschaut would!
In Your concrete example hieße the well:
CompileMarkSeparation {$replace 1:"KERNEL32"}
Def CopyMem(3) !^1^,"RtlMoveMemory"e>
Something like ok?
[/quote:1a6fd24ba5]
Yes, exactly.
the would it but already !
and a Another effect would, the one each commands/function replace could..., z.B. Randomize To ^4^ etc...
Genial !!!
[quote:1a6fd24ba5]the had naturally too to follow, the XPSE after XPIA drüberging again the enh nab must. this is Yes yet not the case, but so be it then.[/quote:1a6fd24ba5]
I observe already, you have moreover virtual 
once means {$replace} vorkommt, go You one second time drüber... ok. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| [quote:94929c69a1=Frank Abbing]
I observe already, you have moreover virtual
once means {$replace} vorkommt, go You one second time drüber... ok.[/quote:94929c69a1]
Ne, the Replace setting still XPIA first mere, odaa? means generally to XPIA again XPSE. only what if the Progger self too $replaces uses?
Hehe?
faith, there's still the following rather:
{$replace somestringlikevariable:ersatztext}
{$replace rmze:randomize}
{$replace _xpia_1:kernel32.dll}
{$replace _xpia_2:kernel16.dll}
blabla, points?
iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | Hi,
[quote:d483897b91]Ne, the Replace setting still XPIA first mere, odaa? means generally to XPIA again XPSE. only what if the Progger self too $replaces uses?[/quote:d483897b91]
is correct Yes...
the goes aale. XPIA becomes then only numbers ex 1000 (or so) use. well ? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| so, I Have ne night drüber slept.
means so Better get going what:
{$replace 1:kernel32.dll}
{$replace 2:kernel16.dll}
def tsts(1) !^1^ bla
def tsts(1) !^2^ blö
very, so GEHTS best. You can quiet ex #1 use, there your xpia Yes The replaces of progger eh not get, because xpse resolve these Yes on! means one begin ex 1000 isn't necessary, plainer for me ists if You ex 1 begin.
To denne, iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Habs same Frank.
*wörkel* *wörkel* *wörkel* *schraub* *accused* *zerr* *inFingerSchneid* *wasFallenLass* *abspeicher*
...
*wörkel* habs same
*ächts*
iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Rolf, could You time quick whom new XPSE wander and say whether You so Problems have?
Büdde büdde.
iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | will be I.
the one in the momentum sowenig of me hears, lying on it, that I gesundheitlich integrally under on the ground be. nevertheless I will it make and try, The couple minutes durchzuhalten.
Rolf |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| If it you not well goes then is the still really not important!!!
Go, mach the it you finally rather goes, you become used!!! *daumendrück*!!!
To denne, David.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(822)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia