XPSE

- Page 2 -

naturally...

my times go too withal terminate all unnecessary Tasks and Services not much better. Have too The priority on high, all Antivirenprogis out etc.:

45°C 54°C 64°C 71°C 72°C 77°C
2844 2860 2859 2860 2875 2844
2828 2828 2860 2844 2844 2859
2812 2812 2890 2812 2844 2813
############################
2735 2735 2735 2750 2750 2735
2781 2734 2765 2750 2750 2750
2719 2735 2766 2844 2766 2812

Result: I custom a Quadcore!
LOL
greeting

08/22/08 ▲

Frank
Abbing

Hehe, I Have not even a Duocore...

08/22/08 ▲

Hm, The 64 bit shine it To bring. AMD fetch allegedly too from less Clockcycles More Rechenpower. Have I already on the AutoCad-computer notice, that there tidy what weitergeht...

If my Prescott heiss becomes, toggles it allegedly withal gleichbleibender Clockrate Energiespar-NOPs into Rechenfluss, so The CPU not abfackelt.
and in the momentum hats here 31 strain in the space - the go ahead its "Entschuldigung"

but I give To: what hülfe one Quad-tiger in the tank, if one donkey

on the Steuer sits...
greeting

08/22/08 ▲

The For-Loop is almost already one Relikt from whom first times the XPSE, objectively it can Loop because of the compel Aufbaus too not at all faster his, as a whileLoop-Loop. the lying simply on it that here a variable used becomes, what against too a benefit darstellt. (because former was &loop in untergeordneten creep sheer Not Available, therefore made these shape sense.) In Anlehnung on The Syntax of Pascal I had me for Begin-End decided (streng) and not for for next.

08/23/08 ▲

Ha, ha..., these &GetTickCount changes The Ablaufzeiten , depending on how much programs I in Windowstaskmanager abwürge.
If I the computer new starte and the Test immediate durchführe, sees it pleasantly from.
If I zwischenzeitlich about other so make and the equal Test starte, come others or longer terms out.

I stops from the whole Laufzeitdiskkussion nothing . is only minimization.

sometimes have I the feeling, the with designed command The complete Registersicherung in the ASM-area unnützt is. The Bremse comes only by the Registersicherung, The differently gehandhabt becomes.

I stops The Profan-creep for very pleasantly and slight nachvollziehbar.
The Geschwindigkeitsverlust is in the Programmablauf not spürbar.

yet have I in Profan-Forum yet no Program found, the this Geschindigkeitsunterschied in anybody point nachhaltige Ablaufprobleme mitbebracht has.

mfg

08/23/08 ▲

Jörg
Sellmeyer

Hm - How come You here because now ASM? The whole Thread deals only of profanschen While-creep. XPSE GetControlParas (B only different Syntaxen to Profan circa, without The but in a others Language To transform. i'm utterly sure, that these creep in ASM midestens around the factor 1000 faster worn out go. then must but too everything inside the Loop in ASM his.

@Frank:
would be a ASM-procedure sense make, The within of/ one Assembler Loop The Funktionsadresse of/ one Profanprozedur aufruft? or runs The Loop then moreover? with one suitable Returnwert should to the still steer can...

Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4
... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...

The Loop over ASM release and only a ProcAddr transfer which from asm angecallt becomes power already sense, becomes in the comparison but not plenty faster his as a whileLoop-Loop. I can but too present the with a designed amount of Parameters the to hinten go goes...

Frank
Abbing

I faith I do not, that the ideal would and plenty makes sense.

does it, one very good example for is z.B. The lineDDA-Api The in the principle already a derartige Zählschleife darstellt. (and therefore often and gladly of me used becomes - z.B. in play)

Jörg
Sellmeyer

I Have Yes still The Vorstelleung a ASM-Loop, a list with the Content one Laufwerks filling. but probably is the by the thereby To benutzenden Apis, How FindFile (or so) neither integral faster as one Profan-AddFiles *=*.*"

Windows XP SP2 XProfan X4
... und hier mal was ganz anderes als Profan ...

Look you still my addfiles.dll on.

either have You a ältere Version or The Message stammt not of xpse?

xpse power here (to that Happiness) still everything correctly:
Compile Mark Separation

 {$cleq}
int i
for i=10 to 20 step 3 do begin
print i
end
waitkey
e

08/27/08 ▲