| |
| |
|
Stefan
Schnell | Hello iF,
first, so find I, is the SyntaxEnhancer a very good idea. 
have it time a little bit tested, but unfortunately without durchschlagenden success, is Yes still in the development.
subesquent code have I as Presentation taken:
CompileMarkSeparation//-Begin----------------------------------------------------------------------
Var a, b : Integer
a = 2
b = 99
Print a
WaitKey
//-End------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
from it power the Enhancer:
CompileMarkSeparation
not straight verständlich for Profan. there shining it another Problem with the space To give.
this code brings Program with a Exception to that crash:
CompileMarkSeparation//-Begin----------------------------------------------------------------------
Declare a%, b%
a% = 2
b% = 99
Swap a%, b%
Print a
WaitKey
//-End------------------------------------------------------------------------
End
Vermute time the lying on the Swap-function.
be on The Weiterentwicklung tensely.
Perhaps two Proposals:
1. the ; as end the Befehlszeile permit.
2. with
CompileMarkSeparation
the Begin not in the equal row expect as Loop.
moreover so...
Tschüss
Stefan |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Erstmal many Thanks Stefan for your Feedback.
 Related to the Var a,b:integer can yet not at all functions, there it not yet implementiert is. I write at Download too the still not any in the program beschriebenen functions implementiert are. The PDF however, The lügt not. 
Related to the Swap is correct, the crashes.  time look Why the lying, is definitiv one bow! thanks for Info!
the Semikolon I will too to introduce want, so You can then too whole Befehlsblöcke in a row write. so How dwelt hold. thereby go naturally too these command berücksichtigt, which Yes in Profan eh schein one Semikolon need. the position but only one small trouble dar.
to that Begin in next row, hmm, now I am not for. it ought to already either only for-do, or for-do-begin hot.
thanks! To denne, iF
PS: I faith you have in Your Profil whom BBCode deaktiviert, hmm, i'd whom on, then klappen too your code-instructions here in the Forum rather. I have your Posting manually korrigiert. your Profil can (there strain Construction site is) only over Members achieve, and then on Edit clicking. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Stefan
Schnell | Hello iF,
>I write at Download too the still not any in the program
>beschriebenen functions implementiert are. The PDF however, The lügt
>not.
I must confess I have me only on The Doku F3 in Your Program held, and The have I do not integrally red, I must well still aufmerksamer reading :roll:
>to that Begin in next row, hmm, now I am not for. it ought to
>already either only for-do, or for-do-begin hot
The demarcation one Blockes is so plainer To discern:
CompileMarkSeparation
find I anyway. 
Tschüss
Stefan |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Jo, haste too somehow right, I lass me what to occur.
iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Ragnar
Rehbein | have even The latest Version tested.
appeal from profane-pad and VWP2 no trouble More !!
have even time quick 3 proposition durchgejagt.
unfortunately there yet 2 small fehlerchen. 
CompileMarkSeparation
the first Error arise, since the leerzeile to b& b
removes becomes. therefore goes the compiler the proc x lost.
can itself quarrel, whether the evtl. one Error the programmieres is...
Correctly should The xpse.exe whom to the leerzeile Remove
the 2. trouble is, the the REM not correctly. interprets becomes.
it arise one DEC REM TRYICON 1&
otherwise thank you very much. i'll The days time so moreover testing.
r.r. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Yeah Ragnar, your Tests rocken! 
really seldom, and therefore have Thanks!, the someone really The Empfindlichkeiten herausfindet! respect! i'll The Buggys naturally eliminating!
iF  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| so, The named Bugs are fixed, now only yet Upload...
thanks again Ragnar, iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Ragnar
Rehbein | |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| does you sorrow? Né né né integrally in the contrary, have large Thanks!
what You there everything rauskitzelst!!! respect!!! 
The Idea with the Ressourcen I had already. i want too for Compilerschalter benefit, circa z.B. the To verlinkende Runtime anzugeben. or circa z.B. the Ressourcehacker to the left To steer, circa ggf. defined Ressourcen hinzuzufügen. so can in each View source and so for each Program decided go, How and what verlinkt becomes. likewise I will a leichtere Connection on the Prf2CPP of Sebastion king create. i think one {$cpp} switch ought to suffice circa XPSE mitzuteilen, the the Source of SEKÖS Prf2CPP weiterverarbeitet go should.
iF  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Ragnar
Rehbein | latest Version just short tested.
includes in the equal verz. go now found. 
not found includes go jezt displayed.
The display over The loaded Files runs unfortunately quick over, so that one ladefehler of includes not any more see can (8-10 includes are by me no seltenheit) 
evtl. with one Error simply stop, or. only The Error spend.
includes The not found go, should in the standard-includeverzeichnis of profane sought go. So one verz. deeper as the network the xpse.exe verz. INCLUDE .
everything else is super. has me today at works already Real helped ! :love: XPSE
r.r. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| [quote:dc281cd26f=Ragnar Rehbein]latest Version just short tested.
The display over The loaded Files runs unfortunately quick over, so that one ladefehler of includes not any more see can (8-10 includes are by me no seltenheit)
evtl. with one Error simply stop, or. only The Error spend.
[/quote:dc281cd26f]
Uhm, runs quick over, xpse has still at Start 200- scrollbare Lines!?
[quote:dc281cd26f=Ragnar Rehbein]includes The not found go, should in the standard-includeverzeichnis of profane sought go. So one verz. deeper as the network the xpse.exe verz. INCLUDE .[/quote:dc281cd26f]
Jepp, so becomes it happen! good idea! so make I the! super, thanks!  
To denne, iF  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| In Vorliegender Version 0.1.2l seek XPSE to whom Includes like a Wildschwein 
so in the Reinfolge:[quote:cf19cce11f]/
/.inc
/include
/includes[/quote:cf19cce11f]then[quote:cf19cce11f]/include/.inc
/includes/.inc[/quote:cf19cce11f]then[quote:cf19cce11f]/.prf
/include/.prf
/includes/.prf[/quote:cf19cce11f]If the Include still not found is, setting XPSE The Search folgendermaßen away:[quote:cf19cce11f]//google? {.inc/.prf}
//dmoz? {.inc/.prf}
//XProfan/foren? {.inc/.prf}
//XProfan-community? {.inc/.prf}
////moon
////UniMatrix[/quote:cf19cce11f]Also can now neither only How from PHP famous with
include myfile
separate too with
#include myfile
worked go. for C-Leuz Perhaps one blessings.
the .inc and .prf can omitted. (see supra)
means only yet:
CompileMarkSeparationI lad too same The Rev. 0.1.2.L high...
 , iF |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(776)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia