| |
| |
|
Jac
de
Lad | Hello iF,
first wished I Roland address, but the has strain XProfan 10 fertiggemacht and therefore therefore I will it something silence grant. too so is it Perhaps sooner a thing for XPSE.
I fänd it useful, if XPSE automatically The functions, The in example in Incs declariert are, but in the program not verewndet go, under whom table entrapments can. I fummel Yes strain on the Controls.inc rum and there käme the well, because sure nobody one Program has, where any functions uses go. one should naturally yet functions How Thread.do mind, The a Inc called go or ProcAddr(), that Perhaps functions Call can, so normal in the program not called go, but Perhaps can you yes a Schlüsselwort kreieren, that The function as protected markiert. And then wären there yet The Containerfunktionen with SubProc, but I think, the would you Perhaps too hinkriegen...I would over so a Extension XPSE jedenfals keen!
Jac |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 11/10/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
 | Beträfe indeed variables...
I look time - on the plan Have ichs eh.
One Schlüsselwort won't necessary his. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | | but what is with Ner PCU, The on ne function outside zugreift? this is of course perversely, but your Thread.pcu machts too (The can Yes not differently...), there brauchste still one Schlüsselwort...!!! |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 11/10/06 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| | No. on the Program Start one Thread.Do -1 reicht. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | there You Yes strain ne new XPSE-Version published have would like I same time this Thread well supra pushen!  |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 05/26/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| have so already began - and xpse finded already z.B. not using Procs. somehow is however my take action moreover not yet reif - its me To gammy and therefore ausgeklammert.
here lying the trouble:
CompileMarkSeparation
or another Variante:
CompileMarkSeparation
step 1: Sola won't using and fly out. thereafter must but again geschaut go - and at 2. look becomes clear, hurry becomes indeed not using - means fly hurry too out. On well german: the process must such a long time repeatedly go To it no Changes in code More gives. and each time must the code new geparst go - one übles undertaking what of course programmiertechnisch simply umzusetzen is - however me personally To gammy is. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | | Why can You not first Durchlauf a list of all functions create, The somewhere called and be schaust in the second step in all Proc and Def to, whether The in the list stand??? |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 05/26/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| | now redest You from the programmtechnischen Umsetzung. likewise does it xpse already. You can with the Shortie u you even so a list spend let. The problem I supra described is so but not of table! |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | where is there a problem:
drop 1:
Sola calls hurry on -> Hurry in list.
Hurry calls sola on -> sola in list.
=> both Procs stay receive.
drop 2:
sola calls hurry on -> hurry remaining receive.
sola must naturally too somewhere differently called go.
One trouble wären Perhaps yet Callbacks, but one could Yes another Schlüsselwort to introduce, so The suitable Procs receive stay... |
|
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 05/26/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| Callbacks are NP if one with procaddr no StringLit angibt - what Yes not must!
You seem the trouble but not yet understood to have - but I Have in the momentum with Frank and Rolf in the Skype To do.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Jac
de
Lad | |
| |
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE)
Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 05/26/07 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
| | I versuchs nevertheless short - if a superfluous proc removes becomes - go so MÖGLICHERWEISE too wieer others procs superfluously. means must the TEST as long as implemented go BIS it no changes in the code More gives. langwierig. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(1.130)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia