| |
| |
|
 |
because You still not verständlich declared have, what nprocs are.
Hello Nico,
thanks for Info and the Thread here - unfortunately can I so but nothing begin I not know can, what You do not understand.
Perhaps. can You me under Beachtung the Documentation [...]  say, what you unclear is.
Inline-Assembler:
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| @Nico:
place you simply one native Profan to, which one in all its XProfan-Programs additional utilize can and which z.B. following Problems so _komplett eliminating:
+ never again with of/ one others Language write must, only so something "schneller" or at all first possible is.
+ never again ProcAddr-Problems.
+ never again slow programs
+ never again Problems with blockierenden APIs.
+ never again no(e) real(s) Sub/SuperClassing and Hooks.
+ never again no real Threads/ parallele Abläufe.
+ never again not in the middle in the code simply Assembler write can.
+ never again no real own Fensterklassen
+ ...too long list...
now place you simply to, that it the already gives - simply to that Download The Alpha-Version: [...] 
i'm hold simply the opinion, that not IO would, if one particularly as XProfan Assembler or C can should, circa speedy and native programs/functions program to. (having We also not necessary)
there's now anyway well nothing more, that one as XProfan not too self program can, means nothing more, where one always first somebody ask must, whether it because not even ne DLL or NEN ASM or C for building.
XPSE is free and this native Profan is a present of XProfan.com all XProfan, my Tuperl to that XProfan circa in relation To all others Languages yet rather so program to.
this native Profan "pimpt" incidentally too XProfan-Free - power hold a Difference whether I z.B. with ProcAddr a Proc angeb The a Interpreter crash can or a nproc The flix does what tappt im dunkeln should - in Interpreter.
anyway, I have the feeling so unüberwindbare Programmer-Problems at program with XProfan eliminating to have, what me letztendlich too into site shifts, The items weiterprogrammieren to, The really otherwise you don't say so been wären. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Frank
Abbing | | would be it then not sooner of benefit, same a Compiler To write, the nativen code produced and Inline-Assembler zulässt? |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | so I had it initially, in both Make becomes Assembler in Objektcode konvertiert - I wished but too the wheel not new invent and on Bewährtes settle too around the hoisted into brauchbares measured To bring. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa |
unfortunately can I so but nothing begin I not know can, what You do not understand.
Perhaps. can You me under Beachtung the Documentation [...] say, what you unclear is.
Perhaps have I already long ago found out, what nprocs are, wants you however it finally from the nose wander circa you to a klaren Statement Ã
la: "Hier have I, this is, the can, the cost nothing!"
One simple "NProcs are Procedures, in them one sowohl XProfan as well as Assembler using can and the of XPSE automatically in Maschinenkode umgesetzt werden", had it still really done, or? 
PS: ought to the last distribution something Wrong include, then is the alone your guilt, because You not correctly. declared have.  |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Nico Madysa, Beitrag=54847, Zeitpunkt=11.11.2009
Nico Madysa, Beitrag=54847, Zeitpunkt=11.11.2009unfortunately can I so but nothing begin I not know can, what You do not understand.
Perhaps. can You me under Beachtung the Documentation [...] say, what you unclear is. Perhaps have I already long ago found out, what nprocs are, wants you however it finally from the nose wander circa you to a klaren Statement Ã
la: "Hier have I, this is, the can, the cost nothing!"
at least be I still time heavy of it gone out! 
Nico Madysa, Beitrag=54847, Zeitpunkt=11.11.2009
One simple "NProcs are Procedures, in them one sowohl XProfan as well as Assembler using can and the of XPSE automatically in Maschinenkode umgesetzt werden", had it still really done, or?
functions! and No, not XProfan as well as Assembler: API, nProcs & Assembler.
Nico Madysa, Beitrag=54847, Zeitpunkt=11.11.2009
PS: ought to the last distribution something Wrong include, then is the alone your guilt, because You not correctly. declared have.
guilt has one always self, counts nunmal for all. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa |
functions! and No, not XProfan as well as Assembler: API, nProcs & Assembler.
„NProcs are functions, The How xprofane Procedures looks, in them one APIs, Assembler and others NProcs Call can and the of XPSE automatically in Maschinenkode transformed go. any XProfan-command and -functions go of XPSE already as NProcs offered.“ (still no Unikode-Support ...)
guilt has one always self, counts nunmal for all.
to that part has too the guilt, ders one not explain wants, though one therefore gebeten has. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | caution people, am momentum very tense.
therefore:
Why becomes always demand, demand and against demand? straight with iF?
If power everything for us umsonst and should itself over ands over again justify? the
goes me increasingly on the Strich.
As I said: whom the To hard appear, from of my feather - Sorry, but its so. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa | Hm, I hope still, that You and iF know, that I not bös my. Since I but white, that iF gladly time its tollen new Erfindungen into round schmeißt what about me its benefit mostly first begreife, if it tappt im dunkeln me to the back door the Lautech-Gebäudes declared, try I simply, with his Help on The right Statement To come.
and Unikode -- I what to that Meckern need, seem I well unconscious of Dietmar übernommen to have. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| @Rolf: Nico what about me make only joke, not so angry his. ^^
@Nico:
guilt has one always self, counts nunmal for all. to that part has too the guilt, ders one not explain wants, though one therefore gebeten has.
very the means the.
and with the the Meckern, that can You time same not stay, verpackt bundled in the bag me as present as gift, I it distribute can. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Nico
Madysa |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Rolf
Koch | @Nico
it was indeed generally meant and not against you personally!!!
I hate it very, if itself people whom Arsch aufreissen, this too yet for Lau and hold then not one Please Please, separate one DU MUSST NOCH or ES SIEHT SO AUS u.s.w ....
means How said, be not angry, only slightly verärgert in the general. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(614)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia