| |
|
|
Jac de Lad | Hello iF,
could you possible The XPSE-Version as Constant install, to that example as $XPSE or so. i think, the could one time need... |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 10/15/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| Ähm Yes no trouble - but hä? For which? The question is because, means The response determining over The Umsetzung! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| i think time, it means: $DEFINE XPSE for bedingte Compilierung, would already important. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Hm power somehow none sense if XPSE Yes nothing Remove can if XPSE Yes not used becomes... or? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| [quote:6dd033500f=iF]Hm power somehow none sense if XPSE Yes nothing Remove can if XPSE Yes not used becomes... or?[/quote:6dd033500f] Kannste me the explain self-evident power it sense, if I discern can, whether XPSE or Profan2CPP or interpreter or bla blub etc.
I can even whom Source for a Profan2CPP DLL, as well as the Testprogramm in a Source unterbringen, depending on what definiert is. Okay, it power not everything sense, but what makes sense, can Yes at the outset yet not at all decide. XPSE ought to means too one Define settle, to distinction, whether XPSE or or...
For this is it virtual. If XPSE not zutreffendes Remove would, would naturally beautiful, power whom Source small.
to that example this komischen export for Units You can then by Compilerdirektive settle, if XPSE active is, or. unless then without these Klausel, so the no Fehlermeldungen come. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| now hats Click made! clear - mach I! |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Michael Wodrich | then can iF same whom beginning with the usage make: CompileMarkSeparation $IFDEF XPSE
{$Runtime Prfrun32.xp9.nores.console.exe}
{$Crq}
$ENDDEFpre> |
|
|
| Programmieren, das spannendste Detektivspiel der Welt. | 10/16/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | Hm, I meant of course really Def $XPSE 0.1.6j but as Compilerschalter ists Perhaps yet sinnvoller. but with the Def had one too yet a Proof for About... and so, where I always everything of others einbringe, there could then too The Version stand... |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 10/16/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | thanks for Umsetzung. but say time, these XPSENumLinesLongCount-How-too-always, what very counts there everything mere. Includes? Leerzeilen? Units? only the ENH-View source? |
|
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 10/16/06 ▲ |
|
|
|
|
| everything what XPSE to that grab near lying means Includes and the Source yourself - spare of Freizeilen - the pure code. CompileMarkSeparation would 3 yield. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jac de Lad | |
|
| Profan² 2.6 bis XProfan 11.1+XPSE+XPIA+XPRR (und irgendwann XIDE) Core2Duo E8500/T2250, 8192/1024 MB, Radeon HD4850/Radeon XPress 1250, Vista64/XP | 10/16/06 ▲ |
|
|
|