| |
| |
|
jacdelad | | gives it really a Possibility .net in XProfan To benefit? Microsoft has Yes with the klassischen APIs nothing More on the hat and develops busy in .net moreover. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
 | No, sooner not, vlt. can Roland a interface building, something like How
result=dotNet("funktion([p1,[...]])")
with Microsoft there one team for OS the too The APIs provides
and a team the then .net hereon anpasst. the Microsoft with the
klassischen APIs nothing more on the hat has is therefore not correctly..
first comes with them The API, then hereon basierend .Net.
I personally see it Yes so: there's one XProfan of Microsoft namens
'.net', where The APIs To "einfacheren" functions abstracted go
integrally like it XProfan tätentut.
there presumably (hopefully?) none in something like How 'VB' program
would like, already not at all someone the XProfan loving, is the wish to
of/ one .net interface for XProfan right nachvollziehbar.
so too the wish to OCX and WMI-Interfaces, The in XProfan
long ago nachgereicht belong! |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Peter
Max
Müller | glad Pentecost.
too i'm the opinion the such Interfaces XProfan well To face stand would. In wieweit the for XProfan umsetzbar is can I unfortunately too only erahnen. From Pascal there already longer OCX Includes. Perhaps would the one beginning for RGH this in XProfan incorporate? we want it Yes not same überfordern 
love Regards |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| I mean i'd (on Rolands place, if to the so say can/
must) with einfacherem WMI begin. Its cool! here super Include [...] 
of unfortunately not any more under us weihendem Andreas. (it missing me  ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
H.Brill | The Support of .NET would find so did i well,
especially since the .NET FRAMEWORK with whom actually
Windowsversionen already vorinstalliert / thereby is. |
|
| |
| Benutze XPROFAN X3 + FREEPROFAN
Wir sind die XProfaner.
Sie werden von uns assimiliert.
Widerstand ist zwecklos!
Wir werden alle ihre Funktionen und Algorithmen den unseren hinzufügen.
Was die Borg können, können wir schon lange. | 05/24/15 ▲ |
|
| |
|
|
|  I wealth that it Specifically at .net Framework a problem his could, that it even not DAS .net Framework gives - go sure many Ifs. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
jacdelad | | About short or long, think I, comes too XProfan there not drumherum. otherwise dümpelt sometime self The latest Version in the Oldie-corner. one can of course single functions nachbauen, or. directly to assimilate, but the .net is simply To powerful circa it To ignore. |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
(327)
Deutsch
English
Français
Español
Italia